The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: III. Cattle requirements and diet adequacy
Abstract
The Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System (CNCPS) has equations for predicting nutrient requirements, feed intake, and feed utilization over wide variations in cattle (frame size, body condition, and stage of growth), feed carbohydrate and protein fractions and their digestion and passage rates, and environmental conditions. Independent data were used to validate the ability of the CNCPS to predict responses compared to National Research Council (NRC) systems. With DMI in steers, the CNCPS had a 12% lower standard error of the Y estimate (Sy.x) and three percentage units less bias than the NRC system. For DMI in heifers, both systems had a similar Sy.x but the NRC had four percentage units less bias. With lactating dairy cows' DMI, the CNCPS had a 12% lower Sy.x. Observed NEm requirement averaged 5% under NRC and 6% under CNCPS predicted values at temperatures above 9 degrees C but were 18% over NRC and 9% under CNCPS at temperatures under 9 degrees C. Energy retained was predicted with an R2 of .80 and .95 and a bias of 8 and 4% for the NRC and CNCPS, respectively. Protein retained was predicted with an R2 of .75 and .85 with a bias of 0 and -1% for NRC and CNCPS, respectively. Biases due to frame size, implant, or NEg were small. Body condition scores predicted body fat percentage in dairy cows with an R2 of .93 and a Sy.x of 2.35% body fat. The CNCPS predicted metabolizable protein allowable ADG with a bias of 1.6% with a Sy.x of .07 kg compared to values of -30% and .10 kg, respectively for the NRC system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Energetics of bacterial growth: balance of anabolic and catabolic reactions
Russell, J. B., & Cook, G. M. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.59.1.48-62.1995 · Cited by 927
Self-citationThe Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system
Tamminga, S., Van Straalen, W. M., Subnel, A. P. J., Meijer, R. G. M., Steg, A., Wever, C. J. G., & Blok, M. C. (1994) · Livestock Production Science · doi:10.1016/0301-6226(94)90043-4 · Cited by 601
The role of Δ9-desaturase in the production of cis-9, trans-11 CLA
Corl, B. A., Baumgard, L. H., Dwyer, D. A., Griinari, J. M., Phillips, B. S., & Bauman, D. E. (2001) · The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0955-2863(01)00180-2 · Cited by 406
Castillo, A., Kebreab, E., Beever, D., & France, J. (2000) · Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences · doi:10.22358/jafs/68025/2000 · Cited by 374
Baumgard, L. H., Matitashvili, E., Corl, B. A., Dwyer, D. A., & Bauman, D. E. (2002) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74294-x · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Fox, D. G., Sniffen, C. J., O'Connor, J. D., Russell, J. B., & Van Soest, P. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-11-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3578-3596
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W79226761
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: III. Cattle requirements and diet adequacy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1992.70113578x
- The paper
- Fox, D. G., Sniffen, C. J., O'Connor, J. D., Russell, J. B., & Van Soest, P. J. (1992). A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: III. Cattle requirements and diet adequacy. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113578x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.