Tenderness of beef loin steaks as influenced by marbling level, removal of subcutaneous fat, and cooking method
Abstract
Loins from 12 carcasses of Small minus marbling and loins from 12 carcasses of Slight minus marbling were selected. Steaks from these loins were either completely trimmed of external fat or trimmed to .6 cm of external fat. Steaks were cooked to 67 degrees C either by a rapid, high-temperature broiler-grill or by a slower, lower temperature electric broiler. Muscle on the dorsal side of steaks (where fat trimming was performed) was used for shear force measurements (five separate core locations), and the ventral portion was used for sensory evaluation of tenderness. Sensory scores for tenderness were affected (P < .05) by various first-order interactions, although differences were minimal. Steaks of Slight minus marbling cooked by broiler-grilling had reduced tenderness scores. Only when steaks were cooked by broiler-grilling did complete fat removal produce cores that appeared more well-done. Broiler-grilling produced more well-done cores than did electrical broiling. Correlations between shear force expressed as peak load and tenderness scores were highest in cores that were more similar in degree of doneness to sensory evaluation samples. Although broiler-grilling produced considerable within-steak variation in degree of doneness, some of the highest correlations between shear core degree of doneness and peak load and between peak load and sensory tenderness were obtained with this broiling procedure. This would imply that rapid broiling is important in creating uniform te…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A thinner layer of subcutaneous fat in steaks would allow easier access to heat during cooking, reducing cooking time, and incrementing cooking loss, affecting beef tenderness.
“a thinner layer of subcutaneous fat in steaks would allow easier access to heat during cooking, reducing cooking time, and incrementing cooking loss, affecting beef tenderness (Berry, 1993)”
From Growth curve, blood parameters and carcass traits of grass-fed Angus steers (2021) · cites this paper as Berry, 1993
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 7 · Cited by 44
- Authors
- Berry, B. W.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Berry, B. W.
- ORCID
- Berry, B. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-09-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2412-2419
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W2409435618
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Keywords
- tenderness, marbling, cooking methods, shear force, sensory evaluation, degree of doneness, peak load
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cattle, Cooking, Meat, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review