Cited by 44Meat and Animal Product QualityPharmacological Effects and AssaysRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology

Tenderness of beef loin steaks as influenced by marbling level, removal of subcutaneous fat, and cooking method

Berry, B. W.·1993·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Loins from 12 carcasses of Small minus marbling and loins from 12 carcasses of Slight minus marbling were selected. Steaks from these loins were either completely trimmed of external fat or trimmed to .6 cm of external fat. Steaks were cooked to 67 degrees C either by a rapid, high-temperature broiler-grill or by a slower, lower temperature electric broiler. Muscle on the dorsal side of steaks (where fat trimming was performed) was used for shear force measurements (five separate core locations), and the ventral portion was used for sensory evaluation of tenderness. Sensory scores for tenderness were affected (P < .05) by various first-order interactions, although differences were minimal. Steaks of Slight minus marbling cooked by broiler-grilling had reduced tenderness scores. Only when steaks were cooked by broiler-grilling did complete fat removal produce cores that appeared more well-done. Broiler-grilling produced more well-done cores than did electrical broiling. Correlations between shear force expressed as peak load and tenderness scores were highest in cores that were more similar in degree of doneness to sensory evaluation samples. Although broiler-grilling produced considerable within-steak variation in degree of doneness, some of the highest correlations between shear core degree of doneness and peak load and between peak load and sensory tenderness were obtained with this broiling procedure. This would imply that rapid broiling is important in creating uniform te…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2527/1993.7192412x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A thinner layer of subcutaneous fat in steaks would allow easier access to heat during cooking, reducing cooking time, and incrementing cooking loss, affecting beef tenderness.

    “a thinner layer of subcutaneous fat in steaks would allow easier access to heat during cooking, reducing cooking time, and incrementing cooking loss, affecting beef tenderness (Berry, 1993)”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 7 · Cited by 44

Authors
Berry, B. W.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Berry, B. W.
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
1993-09-01
Volume
71
Issue
9
Pages
2412-2419
ISSN
  • 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3163
OpenAlex
W2409435618
Cited by
44
References
7
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Keywords
tenderness, marbling, cooking methods, shear force, sensory evaluation, degree of doneness, peak load
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Cooking, Meat, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review