The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Individual differences in docility in Limousin cattle1
Abstract
Docility tests were performed over 3 yr on 906 Limousin heifers sired by 34 males. The heifers were tested individually when they were 10 to 11 mo old in a pen with a handler who had 2 min to lead the animal to a corner, keep it there for 30 consecutive seconds, and then to stroke it. Behaviours of the animals were recorded and scores calculated. The first score (docility score) was a continuous variable combining the greatest possible information. The second score (docility criterion) was a categorical trait with four classes. Tests were performed by seven different handlers. The effects of handler, year, birth period, dam parity, birth region, husbandry system, and sire were estimated. Handlers, birth period, husbandry system, and sire had significant effects. In particular, animals that were managed indoors were more docile than those reared out-of-doors at least part of the time. Heritability estimates of the docility score (.22) and docility criterion (.18) seem sufficient to select for docility traits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Assessment of stress during handling and transport.
Grandin, T. (1997) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1997.751249x · Cited by 1,149
Assessing the human–animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review
Waiblinger, S., Boivin, X., Pedersen, V., Tosi, M.-V., Janczak, A. M., Visser, E. K., & Jones, R. B. (2006) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001 · Cited by 751
Domestic animals’ fear of humans and its effect on their welfare
Rushen, J., Taylor, A. A., & de Passillé, A. M. (1999) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-1591(99)00089-1 · Cited by 331
Fear of People by Cows and Effects on Milk Yield, Behavior, and Heart Rate at Milking
Rushen, J., de Passillé, A. M. B., & Munksgaard, L. (1999) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75289-6 · Cited by 300
Van Reenen, C. G., O'Connell, N. E., Van der Werf, J. T. N., Korte, S. M., Hopster, H., Jones, R. B., & Blokhuis, H. J. (2005) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.06.015 · Cited by 163
Metadata
- Authors
- Le Neindre, P., Trillat, G., Sapa, J., Ménissier, F., Bonnet, J. N., & Chupin, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-08-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2249-2253
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W2400758571
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual differences in docility in Limousin cattle1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1995.7382249x
- The paper
- Le Neindre, P., Trillat, G., Sapa, J., Ménissier, F., Bonnet, J. N., & Chupin, J. M. (1995). Individual differences in docility in Limousin cattle1. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.7382249x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.