The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Livestock odors: implications for human health and well-being.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine the potential effects of livestock odors on the health and well-being of neighbors. Complaints of odor nuisance have become more frequent in communities surrounding areas with high concentrations of livestock. This increase in complaints from livestock odors parallels increased complaints of odor in general, including ammonia, diesel exhaust, beauty products, cleaners, and paints. Persons who report symptoms from odors generally find problems with many different types of odorous compounds. A review of recent studies suggests that the main complaints of health symptoms from odors are eye, nose, and throat irritation, headache, and drowsiness. Sensory irritation (pungency) can be produced by a broad range of odorous volatile organic compounds from trees, flowers, foods (pepper and ginger) as well as emissions from livestock operations. Odors can also potentially affect mood and memory. Further research is required to assess fully the health impact of odors in order to establish recommendations for air quality guidelines based on scientific data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Campagnolo, E. R., Johnson, K. R., Karpati, A., Rubin, C. S., Kolpin, D. W., Meyer, M. T., Esteban, J. E., Currier, R. W., Smith, K., Thu, K. M., et al. (2002) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(02)00233-4 · Cited by 503
Biochemical identification and biological origin of key odor components in livestock waste.
Mackie, R. I., Stroot, P. G., & Varel, V. H. (1998) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1998.7651331x · Cited by 473
Intensive livestock operations, health, and quality of life among eastern North Carolina residents.
Wing, S., & Wolf, S. (2000) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.00108233 · Cited by 271
Odour annoyance and physical symptoms among residents living near waste treatment centres
Aatamila, M., Verkasalo, P. K., Korhonen, M. J., Suominen, A. L., Hirvonen, M.-R., Viluksela, M. K., & Nevalainen, A. (2011) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2010.11.008 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- Schiffman, S. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1343
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W184118471
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Livestock odors: implications for human health and well-being. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/1998.7651343x
- The paper
- Schiffman, S. S. (1998). Livestock odors: implications for human health and well-being. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7651343x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.