The DOI matches its Crossref record.
BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Use of distillers by-products in the beef cattle feeding industry1
Abstract
The ethanol industry is expanding rapidly. This expansion in production of renewable energy also increases production of by-products. These byproducts, primarily distillers grains plus solubles (DGS), are utilized very efficiently by ruminants. When the starch in corn is fermented to produce ethanol, the remaining nutrients (protein, fat, fiber) are concentrated about 3-fold. Whereas DGS is an excellent protein source for ruminants, the large supply and the price relative to corn make DGS an attractive energy source as well. This is especially important with reduced availability and higher price of corn because of demand by the ethanol industry. A meta-analysis of 9 experiments, where various levels of wet DGS were fed to feedlot cattle, shows that wet DGS produced higher ADG and G:F compared with cattle fed corn-based diets without DGS. A similar analysis with dry DGS showed similar type of responses but with less apparent feeding value for dry DGS compared with wet DGS. Metabolism studies suggest the fat in DGS may be partially protected from ruminal degradation leading to greater proportion of unsaturated fatty acids at the duodenum and greater total tract fat digestibility. Both the fat and the undegradable protein in DGS appear to explain some but not all of the greater feeding value of DGS compared with corn. Lower quality roughages may be used in feedlot diets containing wet DGS because of the protein, moisture, and physical characteristics the DGS contains. The feeding value of DGS is greater than dry-rolled corn or high moisture corn; however, the feeding value of DGS appears to be less when fed in finishing diets based on steam-flaked corn than in those based on dry-rolled or high-moisture corn.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bernués, A., Ruiz, R., Olaizola, A., Villalba, D., & Casasús, I. (2011) · Livestock Science · doi:10.1016/j.livsci.2011.03.018 · Cited by 391
Improvements in Life Cycle Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Corn‐Ethanol
Liska, A. J., Yang, H. S., Bremer, V. R., Klopfenstein, T. J., Walters, D. T., Erickson, G. E., & Cassman, K. G. (2009) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00105.x · Cited by 293
Self-citationBeauchemin, K. A., Janzen, H. H., Little, S. M., McAllister, T. A., & McGinn, S. M. (2011) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.047 · Cited by 167
Nuez‐Ortín, W. G., & Yu, P. (2010) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.4052 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Klopfenstein, T. J., Erickson, G. E., & Bremer, V. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-05-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1223-1231
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W2160826381
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Use of distillers by-products in the beef cattle feeding industry1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2527/jas.2007-0550
- The paper
- Klopfenstein, T. J., Erickson, G. E., & Bremer, V. R. (2008). BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Use of distillers by-products in the beef cattle feeding industry1. Journal of Animal Science. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0550
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.