Effects of feeding system and slaughter age on the growth and carcass characteristics of tropical-breed steers1
Open accessAbstract
This study aimed to compare the growth performances and carcass characteristics of tropical-breed steers reared in 2 contrasted feeding systems (indoor vs. pasture) and slaughtered at different ages (early vs. late). A total of 309 Creole steers (growing at an initial BW of 173 ± 3 kg and an initial age of 252 ± 4 d) were used over a continuous 12-yr study. Indoor steers were housed in a cattle shed, fed fresh-cut grass plus concentrate, and slaughtered at 14.5 or 17.1 ± 0.1 mo of age. Pasture steers were pasture grazed without supplemental feed, and slaughtered at 17.6 and 21.2 ± 0.1 mo of age. Indoor-fed steers had a greater ADG (786 vs. 517 ± 29 g•d(-1); P < 0.0001) and more carcass fat (164 vs. 145 ± 4.5 g•kg(-1); P = 0.001) than pasture-fed steers. Late-slaughtered steers had decreased ADG (630 vs. 673 ± 27 g•d(-1); P = 0.001) but greater dressing percentages (hot dressing percentage = 55.7 vs. 54.7 ± 0.34%; chilled dressing percentage = 54.5 vs. 53.4 ± 0.34%; P < 0.0001) than early-slaughtered steers. The interaction between feeding system and slaughter age was significant for carcass tissue composition. Whole-carcass muscle content was greater in late-slaughtered steers than early-slaughtered steers, especially in pasture-fed steers (720 vs. 698 ± 6.0 g•kg(-1); P < 0.0001), but less so in indoor-fed steers (707 vs. 700 ± 5.9 g•kg(-1); P = 0.046). Furthermore, increasing slaughter age had no effect on carcass fat in indoor-fed steers (162 vs. 166 ± 4.8 g•kg(-1); P = 0.3…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A similar value of 54.2%, compared to the 55.4% observed in this study, was previously reported in grass-fed tropical breeds.
“a similar value of 54.2%, compared to the 55.4% observed in this study, was previously reported in grass-fed tropical breeds (Agastin et al., 2013)”
From Growth curve, blood parameters and carcass traits of grass-fed Angus steers (2021) · cites this paper as Agastin et al., 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 17
- Authors
- Agastin, A., Naves, M., Farant, A., Godard, X., Bocage, B., Alexandre, G., & Boval, M.
- Affiliations
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Naves, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Science
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-08-01
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3997-4006
- ISSN
- 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-3163
- OpenAlex
- W2089622887
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.inrae.fr
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
- Keywords
- Creole cattle, feeding systems, indoor feeding, pasture grazing, slaughter age, growth performance, average daily gain, carcass characteristics, carcass fat, carcass yield, carcass tissue composition, beef cattle, tropical cattle breeds, concentrate supplementation
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Animal Husbandry, Body Composition, Body Weight, Cattle, Male, Tropical Climate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review