Cited by 139Pharmacological Effects and AssaysAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyMeat and Animal Product Quality

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of the β-Adrenergic Agonist Cimaterol (CL 263,780) on the Growth and Carcass Characteristics of Finishing Swine

Jones, R. W., Easter, R. A., McKeith, F. K., Dalrymple, R. H., Maddock, H. M., Bechtel, P. J.·1985·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

A randomized complete-block design was used to evaluate the effects of the beta-adrenergic agonist, cimaterol (CL 263,780), on growth rate, feed efficiency and carcass composition of finishing swine. The drug was fed at four levels (0, .25, .5 and 1.0 ppm) to a total of 240 pigs from 64.5 to 103.7 kg live weight. Growth rate and feed efficiency were measured during the 7-wk feeding trial. Feeding cimaterol depressed feed intake, improved feed efficiency and did not alter rate of gain. Carcass evaluation showed that pigs continuously fed cimaterol had 13.2, 9.3 and 9.2% less fat measured at the 10th rib, P2 and average backfat (BF) locations, respectively, compared with controls. Cimaterol-fed pigs had increased loin eye areas (10.9%), and increased semitendinosus (11.8%) and biceps femoris (8.9%) weights compared with controls. The semitendinosus muscles of the cimaterol-fed pigs had less fat and the femur bones were shorter and lighter weight than controls. There were no detected differences in structural soundness of the live pigs, but postmortem evaluation of the hooves indicated that pigs fed 1.0 ppm cimaterol had a higher incidence of hoof lesions. Pigs withdrawn from cimaterol for 7 d were comparable in performance and carcass characteristics with those continuously fed the drug except that carcass fat measurements had generally returned to control values. The data indicate that cimaterol improved the feed efficiency of finishing pigs and increased the lean:fat ratio of their carcasses. Withdrawal of cimaterol caused compensatory fat deposition.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2527/jas1985.614905x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–137 of 137

Metadata

Authors
Jones, R. W., Easter, R. A., McKeith, F. K., Dalrymple, R. H., Maddock, H. M., & Bechtel, P. J.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Easter, R. A.
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
1985-10-01
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
905-913
ISSN
  • 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3163
OpenAlex
W1584012351
Cited by
139
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
16.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Meat and Animal Product Quality
Keywords
cimaterol, beta-adrenergic agonists, fattening pigs, growth rate, feed efficiency, carcass composition, carcass fat, muscle weight, hoof lesions, drug withdrawal
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adrenergic beta-Agonists, Animals, Animal Feed, Body Water, Body Weight, Bone Development, Energy Metabolism, Ethanolamines, Muscles, Organ Size, Swine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review