Cited by 14Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyLivestock Farming and ManagementGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

379 Effects of diet type and feeding phase on intake and feed efficiency of beef cattle

Cassady, C., Felix, T. L., Shike, D. W.·2016·Journal of Animal Science

Abstract

Objectives were to evaluate test period length and repeatability of intake and efficiency measures during the growing and finishing phases, and determine the relationship between intake and efficiency evaluated in cattle fed different diet types. Over a 2-yr period, DMI, ADG, and 12th rib fat thickness were evaluated in crossbred cattle (n = 628) fed for two 70 d periods. During the growing period (first 70 d), a forage-based diet (equal parts corn silage and alfalfa haylage) was fed to heifers and a grain-based diet (50% corn, 15% DGS) was fed to steers. All cattle were fed the grain-based diet for the finishing period (last 70d). Individual DMI was recorded using the GrowSafe (Airdrie, AB, CAN) system. Residual feed intake (RFI) was calculated for each period and was assumed to represent a multiple regression equation, regressing DMI on mid-test metabolic BW, ADG and 12th rib fat thickness. Overall wean to slaughter ADG was calculated for steers by regressing all weights from the start of the growing phase to final BW, calculated as HCW divided by standard dressing percentage (63%). Dry matter intake and RFI were correlated (r = 0.56; P < 0.01, and r = 0.63; P < 0.01, respectively) for growing and finishing periods of steers fed grain. Although, steer ADG was not repeatable (r = 0.11; P = 0.06) across test periods. Growing and finishing ADG were both correlated (r = 0.58; P < 0.01, and r = 0.69; P < 0.01, respectively) to overall ADG. To test the potential of shortening the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2527/msasas2016-379

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cassady, C., Felix, T. L., & Shike, D. W.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Journal of Animal Science
Published
2016-04-01
Volume
94
Issue
suppl_2
Pages
177-177
ISSN
  • 0021-8812 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-3163
OpenAlex
W2337545344
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Animal Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Keywords
beef cattle, residual feed intake, dry matter intake, average daily gain, repeatability, diet type, forage-based diets, grain-based diets, corn silage, alfalfa haylage, steers, heifers, feed efficiency, crossbred cattle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review