A Rhetorical Approach to It Diffusion: Reconceptualizing the Ideology-Framing Relationship in Computerization Movements1
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we propose rhetoric as a valuable yet underdeveloped alternative paradigm for examining IT diffusion. Building on recent developments of computerization movements theory, our rhetorical approach proposes that two central elements of the theory, framing and ideology, rather than being treated as separate can be usefully integrated. We suggest that IT diffusion can be usefully explored through examining the interrelationship of the deep structures underlying ideology and the type and sequence of rhetorical claims underpinning actors’ framing strategies. Our theoretical developments also allow us to better understand competing discourses influencing the diffusion process. These discourses reflect the ideologies and shape the framing strategies of actors in the broader field context. We illuminate our theoretical approach by drawing on the history of the diffusion of free and open source software.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In regimes of continuous temporality, when significant changes take place from outside the project's environment, such change is limited to increasing uncertainty and not to changes in the deep structure of the project.
“When significant changes take place from outside the project's environment, such change is limited to increasing uncertainty (Oh et al., 2016), and not, say, changes in the deep structure of the project (Barrett et al., 2013)”
From The sustainability of open source commons (2023) · cites this paper as Barrett et al., 2013
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 84 · Cited by 128
- Authors
- Barrett, M., Heracleous, L., & Walsham, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Venue
- MIS Quarterly
- Publisher
- MIS Quarterly
- Published
- 2013-03-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 201-220
- ISSN
- 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-9730
- OpenAlex
- W1749409116
- Cited by
- 128
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 16.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- University of Warwick (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
- Keywords
- IT diffusion, ideology, framing, rhetoric, framing strategies, discourse, free and open source software, technology adoption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review