Cited by 444Information Systems Theories and ImplementationKnowledge Management and SharingTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

When Does Technology Use Enable Network Change in organizations? A comparative Study of Feature Use and Shared Affordances1

Open access
Leonardi, Paul M.·2013·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

The goal of this study is to augment explanations of how newly implemented technologies enable network change within organizations with an understanding of when such change is likely to happen. Drawing on the emerging literature on technology affordances, the paper suggests that informal network change within interdependent organizational groups is unlikely to occur until users converge on a shared appropriation of the new technology’s features such that the affordances the technology enables are jointly realized. In making the argument for the importance of shared affordances, this paper suggests that group-level network change has its most profound implications at the organization level when individuals use the same subset of a new information technology’s features. To explore this tentative theory, we turn to a comparative, multimethod, longitudinal study of computer-based simulation technology use in automotive engineering. The findings of this explanatory case study show that engineers used the new technology for more than three months, during which time neither group experienced changes to their advice networks. Initially, divergent uses of the technology’s features by engineers in both groups precluded them from being able to coordinate their work in ways that allowed them to structure their advice networks differently. Eventually, engineers in only one of the two groups converged on the use of a common set of the technology’s features to enact a shared affordance. This convergence was necessary to turn the technology into a resource that could collectively afford group members the ability to compare their simulation outputs with one another and, in so doing, alter the content and structure of the group’s advice network. The implications of these findings for the literatures on technology feature use, affordances, social networks, and post-adoption behaviors in organizations are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25300/misq/2013/37.3.04

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of chatbots in diverse social contexts may lead to the emergence of either individualized, shared, and collective affordances through affecting the technoorganizational context.

    “Second, drawing on the concept of individualized, shared, and collective affordances of Leonardi (2013), we detail how the use of chatbots in diverse social contexts may lead to the emergence of either individualized, shared, and collective affordances through affecting the technoorganizational context.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 67 · Cited by 444

Authors
Leonardi, P. M.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Leonardi, Paul M.
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2013-09-01
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
749-775
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W2143161739
Cited by
444
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 2
FWCI
63.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
technology affordances, network change, advice networks, computer simulation, automotive engineering, technology appropriation, post-adoption behavior, social networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review