Cited by 178HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Internet’s Dirty Secret: Assessing the Impact of Online Intermediaries on HIV Transmission1

Chan, Jason, Ghose, Anindya·2014·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

Online platforms offer access to a larger social group than is generally available through offline contacts, making the Internet an emerging venue for seeking casual sex partners. The ease of seeking sex partners through classified ad sites may promote risky behaviors that increase the transmission of STDs. In this paper, using a natural experiment setup, we investigate whether the entry of a major online personals ad site, Craigslist, increases the prevalence of HIV over a 10 year period from 1999 to 2008 across 33 states in the United States. After controlling for extraneous factors, our results suggest that the entry of Craigslist is related to a 15.9 percent increase in HIV cases. Our analysis suggests that the site entry produces an average of 6,130 to 6,455 cases of HIV infection in the United States each year, mapping out to between $62 million and $65.3 million in annual treatment costs. In addition, the analyses reveal that nonmarket-related casual sex is the primary driver of the increase in HIV cases, in contrast to paid transactions solicited on the site (e.g., escort services and prostitution), which has a negative relationship with HIV trends. These findings are essential to understanding the social routes through which HIV transmission takes place and the extent to which site entry can influence HIV trends. Implications for healthcare practitioners and policy makers are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.01

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long ties can increase the spreading of simple contagions such as disease.

    “For simple contagions, where a single interaction can lead to transmission (e.g., of disease), long ties can increase spreading”

    From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [71]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 178

Authors
Chan, J., & Ghose, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Korea University (KR)
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2014-12-01
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
955-976
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W3122811351
Cited by
178
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
HIV transmission, online intermediaries, Craigslist, casual sex, sex work, escort services, prostitution, sexually transmitted infections, HIV prevalence, treatment costs, social networks, natural experiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review