Cited by 117Social Media and PoliticsMisinformation and Its ImpactsMedia Influence and Politics

Network Structure and Patterns of Information Diversity on Twitter1

Open access
Shore, Jesse, Baek, Jiye, Dellarocas, Chrysanthos·2018·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

Social media have great potential to support diverse information sharing, but there is widespread concern that platforms like Twitter do not result in communication between those who hold contradictory viewpoints. Because users can choose whom to follow, prior research suggests that social media users exist in echo chambers or become polarized. We seek evidence of this in a complete cross section of hyperlinks posted on Twitter, using previously validated measures of the political slant of news sources to study information diversity. Contrary to prediction, we find that the average account posts links to more politically moderate news sources than the ones they receive in their own feed. However, members of a tiny network core do exhibit cross-sectional evidence of polarization and are responsible for the majority of tweets received overall due to their popularity and activity, which could explain the widespread perception of polarization on social media.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.25300/misq/2018/14558

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • User leaning was also estimated by activity in specific groups, by semantics in the posts, calculation of political slant of visited websites by the user, and shared news URLs with news outlets leaning score.

    “User leaning was also estimated by activity in specific groups (e.g., [59,127,143]), by semantics in the posts (e.g., [94,99,113]), calculation of political slant of visited websites by the user [124], shared news URLs with news outlets leaning score (e.g., [8,96,129]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shore, J., Baek, J., & Dellarocas, C.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2018-09-01
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
849-872
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W2493650461
Cited by
117
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 18 · 2012: 1
FWCI
26.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Journal of the Association for Information Systems (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Open Science Framework
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
Twitter, information diversity, echo chambers, political polarization, hyperlink networks, social media, core network, information sharing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review