The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Machine Learning Approaches for Speech Forensics
Open accessAbstract
Several incidents report misuse of synthetic speech for impersonation attacks, spreading misinformation, and supporting financial frauds. To counter such misuse, this dissertation focuses on developing methods for speech forensics. First, we present a method to detect compressed synthetic speech. The method uses comparatively 33 times less information from compressed bit stream than used by existing methods and achieve high performance. Second, we present a transformer neural network method that uses 2D spectral representation of speech signals to detect synthetic speech. The method shows high performance on detecting both compressed and uncompressed synthetic speech. Third, we present a method using an interpretable machine learning approach known as disentangled representation learning for synthetic speech detection. Fourth, we present a method for synthetic speech attribution. It identifies the source of a speech signal. If the speech is spoken by a human, we classify it as authentic/bona fide. If the speech signal is synthetic, we identify the generation method used to create it. We examine both closed-set and open-set attribution scenarios. In a closed-set scenario, we evaluate our approach only on the speech generation methods present in the training set. In an open-set scenario, we also evaluate on methods which are not present in the training set. Fifth, we propose a multi-domain method for synthetic speech localization. It processes multi-domain features obtained from a transformer using a ResNet-style MLP. We show that with relatively less number of parameters, the proposed method performs better than existing methods. Finally, we present a new direction of research in speech forensics i.e., bias and fairness of synthetic speech detectors. By bias, we refer to an action in which a detector unfairly targets a specific demographic group of individuals and falsely labels their bona fide speech as synthetic. We show that existing synthetic speech detectors are gender, age and accent biased. They also have bias against bona fide speech from people with speech impairments such as stuttering. We propose a set of augmentations that simulate stuttering in speech. We show that synthetic speech detectors trained with proposed augmentation have less bias relative to detector trained without it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This approach enables the direct extraction of spectral features from the MP3 compression domain without full decoding, leading to reduced decoding time and significantly lower computational complexity.”
From Audio Deepfake Detection: What Has Been Achieved and What Lies Ahead (2025) · cites this paper as [174]
In the citing paper
“Experimental results demonstrate that when using the same backend model, E-Specs outperform other handcrafted features.”
From Audio Deepfake Detection: What Has Been Achieved and What Lies Ahead (2025) · cites this paper as [174]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Audio Deepfake Detection: What Has Been Achieved and What Lies Ahead
Zhang, B., Cui, H., Nguyen, V., & Whitty, M. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25071989 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Yadav, A. K. S.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Yadav, Amit Kumar Singh
- Venue
- Purdue University Graduate School
- Publisher
- Purdue University Graduate School
- Published
- 2024-10-31
- OpenAlex
- W6926448153
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Purdue (cc-by)
- Funders
- United States Department of the Air Force (FA87502021004)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
- Keywords
- speech forensics, synthetic speech detection, transformer models, disentangled representation learning, bias and fairness, gender bias, speech disorders, impersonation attacks, misinformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review