Cited by 2Peace and Human Rights EducationEducational Philosophies and PedagogiesCritical and Liberation Pedagogy

Dreaming Peace: Oniricopolitics, Imagination, and the Ethics That Caring Is Done With: Journal of Health Care Education in Practice

Open access
Falcone, Graziella, Ragusa, Antonio, Guglielmucci, Fanny·2025·Padova University Press

Abstract

The paper deals with the theme of imagination, peace, and education at the intersection of psychoanalysis, pedagogy and philosophy. Education is always a political action and can become an essential tool for social transformation. The paper deals with the theme of imagination, peace, and education at the intersection of psychoanalysis, pedagogy and philosophy. Education is always a political action and can become an essential tool for social transformation. We argue that education has to be seen as a nurturing space for imagination, reclaiming its role in humankind's evolutionary trajectory toward the Kantian perceptual peace, freeing next generations from domination and violence. Peace is not only the absence of war, but the result of higher mind’s functions and ethical relations and institutions that can foster coexistence. Moreover, it focuses on the importance of dreaming, both from a personal and collective perspective. Dreams allow symbolic re-elaboration. They give us new narratives and possibilities against the Hobbesian concept of homo homini lupus. Herein, the paper will argue, through the integration of Erich Fromm's thesis on love as an art of care and the problem of responsibility, that education can foster the relational capacities needed to construct peace. The urgent responsibility of education is introduced in the extreme world of today, where violence surrounds children and they lack adequate tools to discern that reality. Such is the purpose of the initiative, implemented by the PSYLab of Roma Tre University, aiming to offer new methodologies, among which are storytelling and creative activities that can help children develop a concept of peace. Hence, more than institutional practice, making peace is the ethical practice of relating to the other, demanding that the time has come for educators to demand their space back so that an imaginative, caring, and engaging practice can be formed to carry forward the pedagogy of creating a future where peace is thinkable and possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.25430/pupj-jhcep-2025-1-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Peace psychology lacks a coherent Frommian framework that translates humanistic ethics into concrete guidance for evaluating the peace-relevant effects of technology.

    “As a consequence, peace psychology lacks a coherent Frommian framework that translates humanistic ethics into concrete guidance for evaluating the peace-relevant effects of technology (Falcone et al., 2025).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falcone, G., Ragusa, A., & Guglielmucci, F.
Venue
Padova University Press
Publisher
Padova University Press
Published
2025
OpenAlex
W6926579663
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
1000 Functional Connectomes Project
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peace and Human Rights Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Critical and Liberation Pedagogy
Keywords
imagination, peace education, dreams, psychoanalysis and education, Erich Fromm, responsibility, Kantian peace, social change, violence against children, storytelling, creative activity, relational ethics, coexistence, Hobbesian state of nature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review