Cited by 86Climate Change and Health ImpactsClimate Change Communication and PerceptionMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

The impact of climate change on mental health and emotional wellbeing: current evidence and implications for policy and practice

Open access
Lawrance, Emma, Thompson, Rhiannon, Fontana, Gianluca, Jennings, Neil·2021·Imperial College London

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.25561/88568

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The experiences of climate distress for people in marginalised positions differ from those with social, political, economic and geographic privilege.

    “The experiences of climate distress for people in marginalised positions will differ from those with social, political, economic and geographic privilege. 3-5”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lawrance, E., Thompson, R., Fontana, G., & Jennings, N.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
Imperial College London
Publisher
Imperial College London
Published
2021-05-13
OpenAlex
W3177573099
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 16 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 3
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Imperial College Research Computing Service Data Repository
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
climate change, mental health, emotional well-being, psychological impact of climate change, climate policy, mental health practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review