Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5Artificial Intelligence in EducationDigital Transformation of Higher EducationDigital literacy in education

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

"ChatGPT and me" Erste Ergebnisse der quantitativen Auswertung einer Umfrage über die Lebensrealität mit generativer KI an der Universität Hamburg

Open access
Preiß, Jennifer, Bartels, Mareike, Niemann-Lenz, Julia, Pawlowski, Julia, Schnapp, Kai-Uwe·2023·Universität Hamburg

Abstract

Im Kontext des Digital and Data Literacy in Teaching Projektes (DDLitLab) wurde im Juli eine Online-Umfrage zum Einsatz generativer KI an der Universität Hamburg durchgeführt. Über 1.500 Mitglieder der Universität Hamburg haben sich beteiligt und dadurch erste Einblicke in die neue Lebensrealität mit generativer KI an der Hochschule ermöglicht. Der vorliegende Forschungsbericht enthält die Auswertung der quantitativen Daten. Einstellungen und Nutzungsverhalten werden nach den unterschiedlichen Personengruppen „Studierende“, „Lehrende“ und „Sonstige“ aufgeschlüsselt präsentiert, weiterhin wird auf Unterschiede von Altersgruppen und Fakultätszugehörigkeiten eingegangen.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.25592/uhhfdm.13403

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Preiß, J., Bartels, M., Niemann-Lenz, J., Pawlowski, J., & Schnapp, K.-U.
Affiliations
Universität Hamburg (DE)
Venue
Universität Hamburg
Publisher
Universität Hamburg
Published
2023-09-26
OpenAlex
W6908362635
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1
Type
report
Language
de
Open access
Locations
Universität Hamburg (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital Transformation of Higher Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Digital literacy in education
Keywords
generative AI, ChatGPT

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.