UNEP/IOC Guidelines on Survey and Monitoring of Marine Litter.
Open accessAbstract
Globally our awareness of both the pervasiveness and magnitude of marine litter and the associated environmental and social problems is growing (Ribic et al. 1992, ANZECC 1996a, GESAMP 2001, Kiessling 2003, Cho 2005, UNEP 2005, OSPAR 2006, HELCOM 2007). This growth in knowledge is being paralleled by a concomitant increase in the number and scope of national and international marine litter investigations and assessment programmes. The objectives underpinning these litter assessment programmes are quite diverse with groups/organizations variously targeting increased public awareness, better understanding of the risks and impacts of litter, more understanding of litter sources and sinks to support improved management and not the least, cleaner waterways and beaches at local, regional, national and international scales. This variety in the purpose of assessment programmes is matched by the diversity in the operational structure of those programmes. Regardless of the underpinning motivation, marine litter investigations will generally fall into one of three basic types: 1) Beach litter surveys. 2) Benthic litter surveys, which include: a) Observations made by divers, submersibles or camera tows. b) Collection of litter via benthic trawls. 3) Floating litter surveys, which include: a) Observations made from ship or aerial based platforms. b) Collection of litter via surface trawls. Ultimately, to effectively manage and thereby mitigate the impacts from marine litter, there is a ne…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Monitoring the abundance of plastic debris in the marine environment
Ryan, P. G., Moore, C. J., van Franeker, J. A., & Moloney, C. L. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0207 · Cited by 1,565 · see citing works
Kalogerakis, N., Karkanorachaki, K., Kalogerakis, G. C., Triantafyllidi, E. I., Gotsis, A. D., Partsinevelos, P., & Fava, F. (2017) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2017.00084 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
Hardesty, B. D., Harari, J., Isobe, A., Lebreton, L., Maximenko, N., Potemra, J., van Sebille, E., Vethaak, A. D., & Wilcox, C. (2017) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2017.00030 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cheshire, A. C., Adler, E., Barbière, J., Cohen, Y., Evans, S., Jarayabhand, S., Jeftic, L., Jung, R. T., Kinsey, S., Kusui, E. T., Lavine, I., Manyara, P., Oosterbaan, L., Pereira, M. A., Sheavly, S., Tkalin, A., Varadarajan, S., Wenneker, B., & Westphalen, G.
- Venue
- United Nations Environment Programme
- Publisher
- United Nations Environment Programme
- Published
- 2009
- OpenAlex
- W2740785861
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 18 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- IOC of UNESCO (Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Coastal and Marine Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation
- Keywords
- marine litter, marine litter monitoring, sampling design, litter management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review