The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Platforming digital cultural heritage: history, curation, and platform governance on Google Arts & Culture
Open accessAbstract
This dissertation examines the intersection of cultural institutions and digital platforms, using Google Arts & Culture (GA&C) as a case study of platformization in the cultural sector. Theoretically, it situates GA&C within the intellectual and institutional lineage of the virtual museum, frames the platform as a networked memory institution with risks of digital enclosure and privatization, and unpacks its sociotechnical power through its various governance mechanisms. This study addresses three primary research questions: How did the platform evolve from the original Google Art Project into the current iteration of GA&C? How do the platform’s curatorial interventions and interface design shape content presentation? How do cultural institutions use the platform? A mixed-methods approach is adopted, including archival analysis of the platform’s website, mobile app, and outreach emails, content analysis of a highly curated section of the platform, visual analysis of the platform’s interface architecture, and semi-structured interviews with partner institutions. Key findings reveal a history of convergence among different cultural institutions on the platform but also a divergence from facilitating cultural institutions to engaging audiences through playful experience. The GA&C team plays an essential curatorial and editorial role in deciding project topics and managing featured content, while the platform’s interface prescribes a passive mode of user engagement that falls short of the promises of a truly participatory culture. While cultural institutions hoped for an aggregate portal with technological support from Google to expand their digital presence, the alignment between the platform and the partners, often a response to the partner’s internal digital strategy or external factors such as the global pandemic, ended up being contingent and experimental due to various issues on both sides. Finally, this dissertation also discusses the implications of GA&C for the participatory culture, the editorial role of digital platforms, and the datafication of arts and culture.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yang, S., Zheng, L., Chen, Y., Huang, Y., & Huang, Y. (2025) · npj Heritage Science · doi:10.1038/s40494-025-01725-8 · Cited by 13
Innovative Approaches to Heritage Preservation: Augmented Reality and Islamic Architecture in Egypt
Elnaby, F. M. Z. A., & Soliman, R. E. (2025) · Civil Engineering and Architecture · doi:10.13189/cea.2025.131325 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, T. L., & 0000-0002-0341-0633
- Corresponding author
- Cao, Tiancheng Leo
- ORCID
- Cao, Tiancheng Leo
- Venue
- The University of Texas at Austin
- Publisher
- The University of Texas at Austin
- Published
- 2024-08
- OpenAlex
- W6908596680
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Texas Digital Library (University of Texas)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Museums and Cultural Heritage
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
- Keywords
- Google Arts & Culture, platformization, digital heritage, virtual museum, platform governance, interface design, cultural institutions, digital enclosure, privatization, participatory culture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Platforming digital cultural heritage: history, curation, and platform governance on Google Arts & Culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.26153/tsw/55818
- The paper
- Cao, T. L., & 0000-0002-0341-0633. (2024). Platforming digital cultural heritage: history, curation, and platform governance on Google Arts & Culture. The University of Texas at Austin. https://doi.org/10.26153/tsw/55818