Cited by 7Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationHigher Education Practises and Engagement

Student perspectives on AI in Higher Education: Student Survey

Open access
Chung, Jennifer, Henderson, Michael, Pepperell, Nicole, Slade, Christine, Liang, Yifei·2024·Monash University

Abstract

This document provides the survey items used by the AIinHE project in 2024.The project was a collaborative effort of four major Australian universities: Monash University, the University of Queensland, Deakin University, and the University of Technology Sydney. Co-funded by these institutions, the project aimed to understand higher education students' relationships with generative Artificial Intelligence (AI).In addition to the survey items, the document includes details of the survey construction and further context of the project. Further details about the project, as well as results and publications can be found at the project website: AI in Higher Education: Student PerspectivesA Qualtrics file (.qsf format) of the survey items is also offered here: https://doi.org/10.26180/27922608Please cite the survey as:Chung, J., Henderson, M., Pepperell, N., Slade, C., Liang, Y. (2024). Student perspectives on AI in Higher Education: Student Survey. Student Perspectives on AI in Higher Education Project. https://doi.org/10.26180/27915930

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.26180/27915930

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The survey items were developed through multiple rounds of consultation with the literature and experts and underwent piloting and refinement to ensure content validity and usability.

    “The survey items were developed through multiple rounds of consultation with the literature and experts.In addition, the survey underwent a process of piloting and refinement to ensure content validity and usability.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, J., Henderson, M., Pepperell, N., Slade, C., & Liang, Y.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Venue
Monash University
Publisher
Monash University
Published
2024
OpenAlex
W6945996820
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Monash University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
Keywords
generative AI, student perceptions, university students, artificial intelligence in higher education, student attitudes toward AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review