Cited by 60Reflective Practices in EducationInnovations in Medical EducationStudent Assessment and Feedback

Reflection for learning: teaching reflective practice at the beginning of university study

Open access
Pretorius, Lynette, Ford, Allie·2021·Monash University

Abstract

Reflective practice is a key skill in many professions and is considered an essential attribute of healthcare practitioners. Healthcare students are often expected to develop reflection skills through their assignments, and this is frequently expected to occur with little explicit instruction, practice or guidance about how to reflect. Currently, there is limited guidance in the literature on how teachers can help students develop these reflective skills effectively. In this study, we describe a process for embedding reflective skills into a transition program for new healthcare students about to enter university. By allowing students to explore reflection through a method of self-discovery supported by peer discussion, we found that students were likely to recognise and value reflection as a learning tool (a concept we term “reflection for learning”). Additionally, these students were more likely to continue to practice reflection in their studies than students who had not participated in the training. In summary, this paper demonstrates that students are able to make meaningful deductions about reflective practice and their own learning through use of a basic framework in which to self-reflect, from the very start of their tertiary studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.26180/4141926

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pretorius, L., & Ford, A.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Venue
Monash University
Publisher
Monash University
Published
2021
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
241-253
OpenAlex
W2547434295
Cited by
60
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
25.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Monash University (cc-by)
  • International journal on teaching and learning in higher education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Keywords
reflective practice, health professions students, transition to college, peer discussion, self-discovery, student reflection, healthcare education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review