The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics with the weighted ensemble method: a hybrid method improves thermodynamic and kinetic sampling
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00770
Abstract
Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD) is a well-established enhanced sampling method for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations that effectively samples the potential energy landscape of the system by adding a boost potential, which smoothens the surface and lowers energy barriers between states. GaMD is unable to give time-dependent properties such as kinetics directly. On the other hand, the weighted ensemble (WE) method can efficiently sample transitions between states with its many weighted trajectories, which directly yield rates and pathways. However, the performance of WE (i.e., convergence and efficiency) depends heavily on its initial conditions or initial sampling of the potential energy landscape. Hence, we have developed a hybrid method that combines the two methods, wherein GaMD is first used to sample the potential energy landscape of the system, and WE is subsequently used to further sample the potential energy landscape and kinetic properties of interest. We show that the hybrid method can sample both thermodynamic and kinetic properties more accurately and quickly compared to using either method alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics
Chodera, J. D., & Noé, F. (2014) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002 · Cited by 776
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahn, S.-H., Ojha, A., Amaro, R., & McCammon, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ahn, Surl-Hee
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2021-08-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 7938-7951
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8983023
- OpenAlex
- W3217140102
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (GM31749)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics, enhanced sampling, potential energy landscape, transition rates, reaction pathways, convergence to equilibrium
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review