The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Open data and algorithms for open science in AI-driven molecular informatics
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102542 · Paper page
Abstract
Recent years have seen a sharp increase in the development of deep learning and artificial intelligence-based molecular informatics. There has been a growing interest in applying deep learning to several subfields, including the digital transformation of synthetic chemistry, extraction of chemical information from the scientific literature, and AI in natural product-based drug discovery. The application of AI to molecular informatics is still constrained by the fact that most of the data used for training and testing deep learning models are not available as FAIR and open data. As open science practices continue to grow in popularity, initiatives which support FAIR and open data, as well as open-source software, have emerged. It is becoming increasingly important for researchers in the field of molecular informatics to embrace open science and to submit data and software in open repositories. With the advent of open-source deep learning frameworks and cloud computing platforms, academic researchers are now able to deploy and test their own deep learning models with ease. With the development of new and faster hardware for deep learning and the increasing number of initiatives towards digital research data management infrastructures, as well as a culture promoting open data, open source, and open science, AI-driven molecular informatics will continue to grow. This review examines the current state of open data and open algorithms in molecular informatics, as well as ways in which they could be improved in future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Metadata
- Authors
- Brinkhaus, H. O., Rajan, K., Schaub, J., Zielesny, A., & Steinbeck, C.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
- Westfälische Hochschule
- Corresponding author
- Steinbeck, Christoph
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Structural Biology
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-01-10
- Volume
- 79
- Pages
- 102542-102542
- ISSN
- 0959-440X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4321274994
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Common Library Network (Der Gemeinsame Bibliotheksverbund) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC1127)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Keywords
- open data, open science, molecular informatics, FAIR data, open source software, deep learning, synthetic chemistry, chemical information extraction, natural product drug discovery, research data management, cloud computing
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Software, Informatics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review