PreprintCited by 136Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Benchmarking Refined and Unrefined AlphaFold2 Structures for Hit Discovery

Open access
Zhang, Yuqi, Vass, Marton, Shi, Da, Abualrous, Esam, Chambers, Jenny, Chopra, Nikita, Higgs, Chris, Kasavajhala, Koushik, Li, Hubert, Nandekar, Prajwal, Sato, Hideyuki, Miller, Edward, Repasky, Matt, Jerome, Steven·2022·Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01219

Abstract

The recently developed AlphaFold2 (AF2) algorithm predicts proteins’ 3D structures from amino acid sequences. The open AlphaFold Protein Structure Database covers the complete human proteome. It shows great potential to provide structural information to enable and enhance existing and new drug discovery projects. Using an industry-leading molecular docking method (Glide), we benchmarked the virtual screening performance of 28 common drug targets each with an AF2 structure and known holo and apo structures from the DUD-E dataset. The AF2 structures show comparable early enrichment of known active compounds (avg. EF 1%: 13.16) to apo structures (avg. EF 1%: 11.56), while falling behind early enrichment of the holo structures (avg. EF 1%: 24.81). We also demonstrated that with the IFD-MD induced-fit docking approach, we can refine the AF2 structures using a known binding ligand to improve the performance in structure-based virtual screening (avg. EF 1%: 19.25). Thus, with proper preparation and refinement, AF2 structures show considerable promise for in silico hit identification.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-kcn0d-v2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Vass, M., Shi, D., Abualrous, E., Chambers, J., Chopra, N., Higgs, C., Kasavajhala, K., Li, H., Nandekar, P., Sato, H., Miller, E., Repasky, M., & Jerome, S.
Affiliations
  • Schrodinger (United States) (US)
  • Schrödinger Technologies Limited
  • Schrödinger GmbH
  • Schrödinger, Inc
  • Schrödinger India Private Limited
  • Schrödinger KK
Corresponding author
Jerome, Steven
Venue
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2022-06-27
Volume
63
Issue
6
Pages
1656-1667
ISSN
1549-9596 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4323807713
Cited by
136
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 7
FWCI
18.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, structure-based virtual screening, induced fit docking, structure refinement, DUD-E, early enrichment, hit identification, Glide docking, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Furylfuramide, Humans, Ligands, Protein Binding, Proteins, Benchmarking, Peptide Elongation Factor 1, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review