PreprintCited by 2Malaria Research and ControlHeterocyclic Compound Synthesis and BioactivityPhytochemical compounds biological activities

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of 2,4-dianilinopyrimidines Against Five P. falciparum Kinases PfARK1, PfARK3, PfNEK3, PfPK9 and PfPKB

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.3c00354 · Paper page

Abstract

Plasmodium kinases are increasingly recognized as potential novel antiplasmodial targets for the treatment of malaria, but only a small subset of these kinases have had structure-activity-relationship (SAR) campaigns reported. Herein we report the discovery of CZC-54252 (1) as an inhibitor of five P. falciparum kinases PfARK1, PfARK3, PfNEK3, PfPK9 and PfPKB. 39 analogues were evaluated against all five kinases to establish SAR at three regions of the kinase active site. Nanomolar inhibitors of each kinase are discovered. We identify common and divergent SAR trends across all five kinases, highlighting substituents at each region that improve potency and selectivity for each kinase. Potent analogues were evaluated against the P. falciparum blood stage. Eight submicromolar inhibitors were discovered, of which 37 demonstrated potent antiplasmodial activity (EC50 = 0.16 μM). Our results provide an understanding of features needed to inhibit each individual kinase and lay groundwork for future optimization efforts towards novel antimalarials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-1fg86

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Ong, H. W., de Silva, C., Avalani, K., Kwarcinski, F., Mansfield, C., Chirgwin, M., Truong, A., Derbyshire, E., Zutshi, R., & Drewry, D.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Luceome Biotechnologies (United States) (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
ChemRxiv
Published
2023-08-10
ISSN
2573-2293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385723730
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1726291, 1644868)
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • Bayer
  • Genome Canada
  • National Institutes of Health (1r44ai150237-01)
  • Genentech
  • Division of Chemistry (CHE 1726291, 1726291)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Heterocyclic Compound Synthesis and Bioactivity
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Phytochemical compounds biological activities
Keywords
kinase inhibitors, antiplasmodial activity, structure-activity relationship, antimalarial drug discovery, malaria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review