PreprintCited by 13Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsProtein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predicting Ion Mobility Collision Cross Sections using Projection Approximation with ROSIE-PARCS Webserver

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/bib/bbad308 · Paper page

Abstract

Ion mobility (IM) coupled to mass spectrometry informs on the shape and size of protein structures in the form of a collision cross section (CCSIM). While there are several computational methods for predicting CCSIM based on protein structures, including our previously developed PARCS, the process usually requires prior experience with the command-line interface (CLI). To overcome this challenge, here we present a web application on the ROSIE webserver to predict CCSIM from protein structure using projection approximation with PARCS. In this web interface, the user is only required to provide one or more PDB files as input. Results from our case studies suggest that CCSIM predictions (with ROSIE-PARCS) are highly accurate with an average error of 6.12%. Furthermore, the absolute difference between CCSIM and CCSPARCS can help in distinguishing accurate from inaccurate AlphaFold2 protein structure predictions. ROSIE-PARCS is designed with a user-friendly interface, is available publicly, and is free to use. The ROSIE-PARCS web interface is supported by all major web browsers and can be accessed via this link (https://rosie.graylab.jhu.edu).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-4j9gl

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Turzo, S. B., Seffernick, J., Lyskov, S., & Lindert, S.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Lindert, Steffen
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2023-02-27
Volume
24
Issue
5
ISSN
1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386084210
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (P41 GM128577)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
projection approximation, PARCS, web server, protein structure, ion mobility mass spectrometry
MeSH terms
Ion Mobility Spectrometry, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Buffers, Gases, Proteins, Software, User-Computer Interface, Internet, Web Browser, Datasets as Topic, Open Access Publishing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review