The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-eGO: model improvements towards the study of complex self-assembly processes
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01182 · Paper page
Abstract
Structure-based models have been instrumental in simulating protein folding and suggesting hypotheses about the mechanisms involved. Nowadays, at least for fast folding proteins, folding can be simulated in explicit solvent using classical molecular dynamics. However, other self-assembly processes, such as protein aggregation, are still far from being accessible. Recently, we proposed that a hybrid multi-state structure-based model, multi-eGO, could help to bridge the gap towards the simulation of out-of-equilibrium, concentration-dependent self-assembly processes. Here, we further improve the model and show how multi-eGO can effectively and accurately learn the conformational ensemble of the Amyloid β42 intrinsically disordered peptide, reproduce the well-established folding mechanism of the B1 immunoglobulin-binding domain of streptococcal protein G, and reproduce the aggregation as a function of the concentration of the Transthyretin 105-115 amyloidogenic peptide. We envision that by learning from the dynamics of a few minima, multi-eGO can become a platform for simulating processes inaccessible to other simulation techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Bacic Toplek, F., Scalone, E., Stegani, B., Paissoni, C., Capelli, R., & Camilloni, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan
- Dartmouth College (US)
- University of Milan (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Camilloni, Carlo
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-10-25
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 459-468
- ISSN
- 1549-9618 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10782439
- OpenAlex
- W4390339339
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Università degli Studi di Milano
- Fondazione Telethon (GGP19134)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Keywords
- structure-based models, protein self-assembly, protein folding, protein aggregation, amyloid-beta 42, intrinsically disordered peptides, streptococcal protein G, prealbumin, amyloidogenic peptides, conformational ensembles, nonequilibrium processes, concentration-dependent aggregation
- MeSH terms
- Ego, Peptides, Protein Conformation, Protein Folding, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review