The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Active Learning of Neural Network Potentials for Rare Events
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1039/d3dd00216k
Abstract
Atomistic simulation with machine learning-based potentials (MLPs) is an emerging tool for understanding materials' properties and behaviors and predicting novel materials. Neural network potentials (NNPs) are outstanding in this field as they have shown a comparable accuracy to ab initio electronic structure calculations for reproducing potential energy surfaces while being several orders of magnitude faster. However, such NNPs can perform poorly outside their training domain and often fail catastrophically in predicting rare events in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The rare events in atomistic modeling typically include chemical bond breaking/formation, phase transitions, and materials failure, which are critical for new materials design, synthesis, and manufacturing processes. In this study, we develop an automated active learning (AL) capability by combining NNPs and enhanced sampling methods for capturing rare events to derive NNPs for targeted applications. We develop a decision engine based on configurational similarity and uncertainty quantification (UQ), using data augmentation for effective AL loops to distinguish the informative data from enhanced sampled configurations, showing that the generated data set achieves an activation energy error of less than 1 kcal/mol. Furthermore, we have devised a strategy to alleviate training uncertainty within AL iterations through a carefully constructed data selection process that leverages an ensemble approach. Our study provides essential insight into the relationship between data and the performance of NNP for the rare event of bond breaking under mechanical loading. It highlights strategies for developing NNPs of broader materials and applications through active learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, G. S., Choi, J. Y., & Lee, S.
- Affiliations
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jung, Gang Seob
- Venue
- Digital Discovery
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-08-13
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 514-527
- ISSN
- 2635-098X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391966924
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Digital Discovery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (AC05-00OR22725, DE--AC05--00OR22725, DE-AC05?, Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725, No. DE-AC05-00OR22725, 00OR22725)
- Battelle (DE-AC05- 00OR22725, DE-AC05)
- UT-Battelle (DE-AC05, DEAC05-00OR22725, No. DE-AC05-00OR22725, AC05-00OR22725)
- Office of Science (DEAC05- 00OR22725, No. DE-AC05-00OR22725, AC05-00OR22725)
- Laboratory Directed Research and Development (DE-AC05-00OR22725)
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (AC05-00OR22725, Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725, DE-AC05-00OR22725)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
- Keywords
- neural network potentials, active learning (machine learning), rare events, bond cleavage, steered molecular dynamics, model transferability, interatomic potentials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.