PreprintCited by 14Carbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisGlycosylation and Glycoproteins ResearchEnzyme Catalysis and Immobilization

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GASP: A pan-specific predictor of family 1 glycosyltransferase specificity enabled by a pipeline for substrate feature generation and large-scale experimental screening

Open access
Harding-Larsen, David, Degnbol Madsen, Christian, Teze, David, Kittilä, Tiia, Rosander Langhorn, Mads, Gharabli, Hani, Hobusch, Mandy, Mejia Otalvaro, Felipe, Kırtel, Onur, Nahuel Bidart, Gonzalo, Mazurenko, Stanislav, Travnik, Evelyn, Hededam Welner, Ditte·2023·ACS Omega

Preprint — published as 10.1021/acsomega.4c01583 · Paper page

Abstract

Glycosylation represents a major chemical challenge; while it is one of the most common reactions in Nature, conventional chemistry struggles with stereochemistry, regioselectivity and solubility issues. In contrast, family 1 glycosyltransferase (GT1) enzymes can glycosylate virtually any given nucleophilic group with perfect control over stereochemistry and regioselectivity. However, the appropriate catalyst for a given reaction needs to be identified among the tens of thousands of available sequences. Here, we present the Glycosyltransferase Acceptor Specificity Predictor (GASP) model, a data-driven approach to the identification of reactive GT1:acceptor pairs. We trained a random forest-based acceptor predictor on literature data and validated it on independent in-house generated data on 1001 GT1:acceptor pairs, obtaining an AUROC of 0.79 and a balanced accuracy of 72%. GASP is capable of parsing all known GT1 sequences, as well as all chemicals, the latter through a pipeline for the generation of 153 chemical features for a given molecule taking the CID or SMILES as input (freely available at https://github.com/degnbol/GASP). GASP had an 83% hit rate in a comparative case study for the glycosylation of the anti-helminth drug niclosamide, significantly outperforming a hit rate of 53% from a random selection assay. However, it was unable to compete with a hit rate of 83% for the glycosylation of the plant defensive compound DIBOA using expert-selected enzymes, with GASP achieving a hit rate of 50%. The hierarchal importance of the generated chemical features was investigated by negative feature selection, revealing properties related to cyclization and atom hybridization status to be the most important characteristics for accurate prediction. Our study provides a ready-to-use GT1:acceptor predictor which in addition can be trained on other datasets enabled by the automated feature generation pipelines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-pr9ck

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Harding-Larsen, D., Degnbol Madsen, C., Teze, D., Kittilä, T., Rosander Langhorn, M., Gharabli, H., Hobusch, M., Mejia Otalvaro, F., Kırtel, O., Nahuel Bidart, G., Mazurenko, S., Travnik, E., & Hededam Welner, D.
Affiliations
  • Technical University of Denmark (DK)
  • Technical University of Denmark
  • Masaryk University (CZ)
Venue
ACS Omega
Published
2023-11-03
Volume
9
Issue
25
Pages
27278-27288
ISSN
2470-1343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399519895
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACS Omega (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Veřejné služby Informačního systému (Masarykiana Brunensis Universitas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18OC0034744, NNF10CC1016517, and NNF20CC0035580)
  • Horizon 2020 (CETOCOEN EXCELLENCE No 857560)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
Keywords
glycosylation, random forest, DIBOA, enzyme screening, feature importance, automatic feature selection, regioselectivity, stereocontrol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review