The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bispecific Antibodies Produced via Chemical Site-Specific Conjugation Technology: AJICAP Second Generation
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.3c00414
Abstract
Bispecific antibodies are biotherapeutics that amalgamate the specificities of two distinct antibodies into one molecule. Bispecific antibodies can be utilized in a broad range of diagnostic and therapeutic applications; however, their engineering requires genetic modification and remains time-consuming. Therefore, in this study, we used AJICAP second-generation technology, which drives the production of site-specific antibody-drug conjugates in a practical and robust manner, without genetic modification requirements, to generate bispecific antibodies. Using haloketone chemistry as an alternative to maleimide chemistry, which carries reaction risks, we successfully produced site-specific antibody conjugates. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that the haloketone-based antibody conjugate was stable in the rat plasma. The resultant bispecific antibodies were rigorously evaluated, and surface plasmon resonance measurements and flow cytometry analyses confirmed that antigen binding remained intact. Additionally, the affinity for the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) was retained after conjugation. Further cytotoxicity evaluation emphasized the pronounced activity of the generated bi-specific antibodies. These preliminary findings highlight the potential of AJICAP second-generation technology in BisAb production. This novel approach introduces a fully chemical, site-specific strategy capable of producing bispecific antibodies, heralding a new era in the field of biotherapeutics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Metadata
- Authors
- Fujii, T., Ito, K., Takahashi, K., Aoki, T., Seki, T., Iwai, Y., Takasugi, R., Watanabe, T., Hirama, R., Tsumura, R., Fuchigami, H., Yasunaga, M., & Matsuda, Y.
- Affiliations
- Ajinomoto (Japan) (JP)
- National Cancer Center Hospital East (JP)
- Ajinomoto Althea (United States)
- Corresponding author
- Fujii, Tomohiro
- Matsuda, Yutaka
- ORCID
- Venue
- ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2023-08-25
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1767-1773
- ISSN
- 1948-5875 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10726434
- OpenAlex
- W4388861191
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters (publishedVersion)
- ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Click Chemistry and Applications
- Keywords
- bispecific antibodies, antibody conjugates, neonatal Fc receptor, pharmacokinetics, antigen binding, cytotoxicity, biologic therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.