PreprintCited by 25Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Representing Structures of the Multiple Conformational States of Proteins

Open access
Ramelot, Theresa, Tejero, Roberto, Montelione, Gaetano·2023·Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102703 · Paper page

Abstract

Biomolecules exhibit dynamic behavior that single-state models of their structures cannot fully capture. We review some recent advances for investigating multiple conformations of biomolecules, including experimental methods, molecular dynamics simulations, and machine learning. We also address the challenges associated with representing single- and multiple-state models in data archives, with a particular focus on NMR structures. Establishing standardized representations and annotations will facilitate effective communication and understanding of these complex models to the broader scientific community.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-wc3mx

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ramelot, T., Tejero, R., & Montelione, G.
Affiliations
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ramelot, Theresa
  • Montelione, Gaetano
Venue
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Published
2023-07-31
Volume
83
Pages
102703-102703
ISSN
0959-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387128962
Cited by
25
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM141818)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Keywords
protein conformational ensembles, biomolecular dynamics, NMR structure, molecular dynamics simulation, machine learning, data archiving, structural annotation
MeSH terms
Molecular Conformation, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review