Cited by 55Ethics and Social Impacts of AIMisinformation and Its ImpactsFeminist Epistemology and Gender Studies

Deepfakes, Deep Harms

Open access
Rini, Regina, Cohen, Leah·2022·Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy

Abstract

Deepfakes are algorithmically modified video and audio recordings that project one person’s appearance on to that of another, creating an apparent recording of an event that never took place. Many scholars and journalists have begun attending to the political risks of deepfake deception. Here we investigate other ways in which deepfakes have the potential to cause deeper harms than have been appreciated. First, we consider a form of objectification that occurs in deepfaked "frankenporn" that digitally fuses the parts of different women to create pliable characters incapable of giving consent to their depiction. Next, we develop the idea of illocutionary wronging, in which an individual is forced to engage in speech acts they would prefer to avoid in order to deny or correct the misleading evidence of a publicized deepfake. Finally, we consider the risk that deepfakes may facilitate campaigns of "panoptic gaslighting," where many systematically altered recordings of a single person's life undermine their memory, eroding their sense of self and ability to engage with others. Taken together, these harms illustrate the roles that social epistemology and technological vulnerabilities play in human ethical life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26556/jesp.v22i2.1628

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Production of deepfake pornographic content presents significant reputational risk and the threat of publication could deter candidates from standing in elections.

    “Notably, the production of deepfake pornographic content presents a significant reputational risk and thus the very threat of publication could 105. be used to deter candidates from standing in elections, as will be discussed in more detail below (Adjer et al., 2019;Rini & Cohen, 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Abramson, Kate. "Turning Up the Lights on Gaslighting. " Philosophical Perspec- tives 28 (2014): 1-30.
  2. Baker, Lynne Rudder. Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 2000.
  3. Basu, Rima, and Mark Schroeder. "Doxastic Wronging. " In Pragmatic Encroach- ment in Epistemology, edited by Brian Kim and Matthew McGrath, 181-205. New York: Routledge, 2019.
  4. Bauer, Nancy. How to Do Things with Pornography. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015.
  5. Cawston, Amanda. "The Feminist Case against Pornography: A Review and Re-evaluation. " Inquiry 62, no. 6 (2019): 624-58.
  6. We owe thanks to the editors and referees for the journal, as well as to audiences at the Uni- versity of Toronto Centre for Ethics and the Department of Philosophy at the University of Waterloo. This research was supported by York University's Vision: Science to Applications (VISTA) project.
  7. Cuneo, Terence. The Normative Web: An Argument for Moral Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  8. Dworkin, Andrea. "Against the Male Flood: Censorship, Pornography, and Equality. " Harvard Women's Law Journal 8, no. 1 (1985): 1-29.
  9. Harris, Douglas. "Deepfakes: False Pornography Is Here and the Law Cannot Protect You. " Duke Law and Technology Review 17 (2019): 99-127.
  10. Johnston, Mark. "Human Beings. " Journal of Philosophy 84, no. 2 (February 1987): 59-83.
  11. Jones, Karen. "The Politics of Intellectual Self-Trust. " Social Epistemology 26, no. 2 (2012): 237-51.
  12. Li, Yuezun, and Siwei Lyu. "Exposing DeepFake Videos by Detecting Face Warping Artifacts. " arXiv, 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.00656. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Liu, Lingjie, Weipeng Xu, Michael Zollhöfer, Hyeongwoo Kim, Florian Bernard, Marc Habermann, Wenping Wang, and Christian Theobalt. "Neural Render- ing and Reenactment of Human Actor Videos. " ACM Transactions on Graphics 38, no. 5 (October 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3333002. · DOI · Paper page
  14. MacKinnon, Catharine. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cam- bridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
  15. Maitra, Ishani. "Silencing Speech. " Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39, no. 2 ( June 2009): 309-38.
  16. Marušić, Berislav. Evidence and Agency: Norms of Belief for Promising and Resolv- ing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
  17. Parfit, Derek. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984.
  18. Searle, John. The Rediscovery of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
  19. Srinivasan, Amia. "Radical Externalism. " Philosophical Review 129, no. 3 ( July 2020): 395-431.
  20. Thies, Justus, Michael Zollhöfer, Marc Stamminger, Christian Theobalt, and Matthias Nießner. "Face2Face: Real-Time Face Capture of Reenactment of RGB Videos. " Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, March 17, 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohmajJTcpNk.
  21. Williams, Bernard. Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rini, R., & Cohen, L.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy
Published
2022-07-01
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
143-161
ISSN
1559-3061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4288040851
Cited by
55
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
Keywords
deepfakes, objectification, consent, speech acts, memory, selfhood, social epistemology, technological vulnerability, deception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review