Investigating the Effects of Learning Tasks on Vocabulary Knowledge
Open accessAbstract
This thesis looks at whether different kinds of vocabulary learning tasks result in different types of word knowledge. In almost every study that has investigated the effects of tasks on vocabulary learning; the only aspect of word knowledge that was tested was meaning and form. Since researchers agree that knowing a word involves much more than knowing its meaning and form, prior research may have measured partial knowledge of only one of several aspects of knowledge. In order to determine the effects of vocabulary learning tasks, several aspects of knowledge should be tested. The experiments in this thesis investigated how vocabulary learning tasks affect both receptive and productive knowledge of five aspects of word knowledge: orthography, association, syntax, meaning and form, and grammatical functions. In the first of six experiments, the effects of incidental learning from reading and explicit learning from word pairs on word knowledge were compared. The results indicated that gains in knowledge tend to increase as the number of repetitions increases; however, partial gains from an informative context may be reduced or eliminated if followed by a less informative context. The results also showed that learning from word pairs contributed to surprisingly greater gains in all of the aspects. In the second experiment, two tasks (learning from glossed sentences, and learning from word pairs) were compared to determine the effects of context and synonymy on vocabulary knowle…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement
Laufer, B. (2001) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/22.1.1 · Cited by 1,334 · see citing works
Some empirical evidence for the involvement load hypothesis in vocabulary acquisition
Hulstijn, J. H., & Laufer, B. (2001) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00164 · Cited by 819 · see citing works
Incidental EFL vocabulary learning and reading
Day, R. R., Omura, C., & Hiramatsu, M. (1991) · Reading in a Foreign Language · doi:10.64152/10125/67035 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
List learning of second language vocabulary
Griffin, G., & Harley, T. A. (1996) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716400008195 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
RECEPTIVE AND PRODUCTIVE VOCABULARY LEARNING: The Effects of Reading and Writing on Word Knowledge
Webb, S. (2005) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263105050023 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Self-citationNation, P. (2007) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.2167/illt039.0 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
“Webb (2002) found”
BackgroundNakata, T. (2011) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.520675 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
- Authors
- Webb, S. A.
- Corresponding author
- Webb, Stuart Alexander
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4244562529
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- Type
- dissertation
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ResearchArchive–Te Puna Rangahau (Victoria University of Wellington) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- vocabulary acquisition, vocabulary knowledge, receptive vocabulary, expressive vocabulary, incidental learning, explicit learning, word pairs, glossed sentences, synonymy (linguistics), context effects, orthography, grammatical function, word association, second language vocabulary
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review