The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Integration of Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Practices (IKSPs) in the K to 12 Curriculum for Sama Bajaus: A Case Study
Abstract
This study is concerned with mending the gap in department orders, specifically the policy framework on IPED known as DO No. 62, s. 2011, which was meant for indigenous groups. The study would concentrate on finding significant data to recommend a tailored policy framework that would answer the needs of Sama Bajaus. This study utilized a convergent mixed method with teachers, school heads, students, parents of students from pre-selected education institutions in Batangas, Sama Bajau elders, and local government and NCIP officials served as the participants. Based on the results and discussions presented in this study, it is concluded that the Indigenous Knowledge System and Practices (IKSPs) of the Sama Bajau community exhibit characteristics that align with curriculum integration, promoting cultural advancement, social inclusion, and the preservation of Indigenous heritage. Integration of Sama Bajau’s IKSPs within the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum has the potential to support Sama Bajau learners by offering increased learning opportunities that are culturally sensitive and inclusive. Furthermore, it can enhance the awareness and understanding of school personnel, particularly teachers and school heads, regarding the importance of localizing and indigenizing knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values (KSAV) in education. However, the study also revealed that challenges and issues are impeding the effective integration of IKSPs into the curriculum. These challenges include the availability of cultural learning resources and the overall responsiveness of the educational system. It was found that the extent of integration of Sama Bajau’s IKSPs is significantly related to the problems and issues encountered. Therefore, a policy recommendation is suggested to address the gaps in localization and indigenization within the curriculum, ensuring that learners’ needs are adequately met.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“IKS are an essential part of the cultural fabric of many communities and provide valuable insights on sustainability, resource management, and education [12, 21, 39].”
From Designing Responsible AI with Indigenous Communities: Towards Participatory AI with ovaHimba and San People in Namibia (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indongo, N. N., Smith, R. C., Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Kandjengo, S., & Mbinge, U. (2026) · Proceedings of the 19th Participatory Design Conference 2026, Vol. 1: Full Papers · doi:10.1145/3796624.3796667 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ilagan, R. O.
- Affiliations
- Department of Education (PH)
- Corresponding author
- Ilagan, Rhina O.
- Venue
- International Education Forum
- Published
- 2024-10-29
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 82-92
- ISSN
- 2981-8605 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4403915146
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- FWCI
- 3.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Education Forum (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Keywords
- indigenous knowledge, Sama-Bajau, K-12 curriculum, curriculum integration, Indigenous education policy, cultural localization, social inclusion, Batangas
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review