Cited by 3Indigenous and Place-Based EducationIndigenous Cultures and Socio-EducationIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Integration of Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Practices (IKSPs) in the K to 12 Curriculum for Sama Bajaus: A Case Study

Ilagan, Rhina O.·2024·International Education Forum

Abstract

This study is concerned with mending the gap in department orders, specifically the policy framework on IPED known as DO No. 62, s. 2011, which was meant for indigenous groups. The study would concentrate on finding significant data to recommend a tailored policy framework that would answer the needs of Sama Bajaus. This study utilized a convergent mixed method with teachers, school heads, students, parents of students from pre-selected education institutions in Batangas, Sama Bajau elders, and local government and NCIP officials served as the participants. Based on the results and discussions presented in this study, it is concluded that the Indigenous Knowledge System and Practices (IKSPs) of the Sama Bajau community exhibit characteristics that align with curriculum integration, promoting cultural advancement, social inclusion, and the preservation of Indigenous heritage. Integration of Sama Bajau’s IKSPs within the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum has the potential to support Sama Bajau learners by offering increased learning opportunities that are culturally sensitive and inclusive. Furthermore, it can enhance the awareness and understanding of school personnel, particularly teachers and school heads, regarding the importance of localizing and indigenizing knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values (KSAV) in education. However, the study also revealed that challenges and issues are impeding the effective integration of IKSPs into the curriculum. These challenges include the availability of cultural learning resources and the overall responsiveness of the educational system. It was found that the extent of integration of Sama Bajau’s IKSPs is significantly related to the problems and issues encountered. Therefore, a policy recommendation is suggested to address the gaps in localization and indigenization within the curriculum, ensuring that learners’ needs are adequately met.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26689/ief.v2i9.8720

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ilagan, R. O.
Affiliations
Department of Education (PH)
Corresponding author
Ilagan, Rhina O.
Venue
International Education Forum
Published
2024-10-29
Volume
2
Issue
9
Pages
82-92
ISSN
2981-8605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403915146
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Education Forum (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Cultures and Socio-Education
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Keywords
indigenous knowledge, Sama-Bajau, K-12 curriculum, curriculum integration, Indigenous education policy, cultural localization, social inclusion, Batangas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review