Cited by 20Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInnovations in Medical EducationInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

Implementing an interprofessional education programme in Lebanon: overcoming challenges

Open access
Farra, Anna, Zeenny, Rony, Nasser, Soumana, Asmar, Nadia, Milane, Aline, Bassil, Maya, Haidar, Mona, Habre, Maha +2 more·2018·Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Lebanese American University has a well-functioning inter-professional education (IPE) programme; this is a fundamental pedagogical approach in healthcare education in which students from different professions learn together, ultimately leading to improving the skills of the health care workforce and thus improving patient outcomes. The programme includes nursing, nutrition, medicine, pharmacy and social work students, and has now been running for 6 years. AIMS: This paper aims at describing the implementation of an IPE programme in Lebanon by focusing on how to overcome the main challenges. METHODS: We describe our experience using the categories of challenges developed by Sunguya et al. (2014), where they analysed published reports of IPE programmes in developed countries. We identified three additional challenges that might be relevant throughout the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region or in countries with similar socioeconomic characteristics. RESULTS: The challenges encountered in designing and implementing the IPE programme were similar to other programmes: curriculum, leadership, resources, stereotypes and attitudes, variety of students, IPE concept, teaching, enthusiasm, professional jargon and accreditation as well as assessment of learning, security and logistics. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides data and successful strategies that can be used by planned or implemented programmes in similar socioeconomic contexts in the MENA region.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26719/2018.24.9.914

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Farra, A., Zeenny, R., Nasser, S., Asmar, N., Milane, A., Bassil, M., Haidar, M., Habre, M., Zeeni, N., & Hoffart, N.
Affiliations
  • Lebanese American University (LB)
  • American University of Beirut (LB)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Venue
Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal
Published
2018-09-01
Volume
24
Issue
09
Pages
914-921
ISSN
  • 1020-3397 (ISSN-L)
  • 1687-1634
OpenAlex
W2905006918
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
interprofessional education, nursing education, pharmacy education, curriculum development, educational leadership, occupational stereotypes, learning assessment, accreditation, Middle East and North Africa, Lebanon
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Health Personnel, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Lebanon, Program Evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review