Implementing an interprofessional education programme in Lebanon: overcoming challenges
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The Lebanese American University has a well-functioning inter-professional education (IPE) programme; this is a fundamental pedagogical approach in healthcare education in which students from different professions learn together, ultimately leading to improving the skills of the health care workforce and thus improving patient outcomes. The programme includes nursing, nutrition, medicine, pharmacy and social work students, and has now been running for 6 years. AIMS: This paper aims at describing the implementation of an IPE programme in Lebanon by focusing on how to overcome the main challenges. METHODS: We describe our experience using the categories of challenges developed by Sunguya et al. (2014), where they analysed published reports of IPE programmes in developed countries. We identified three additional challenges that might be relevant throughout the Middle East/North Africa (MENA) region or in countries with similar socioeconomic characteristics. RESULTS: The challenges encountered in designing and implementing the IPE programme were similar to other programmes: curriculum, leadership, resources, stereotypes and attitudes, variety of students, IPE concept, teaching, enthusiasm, professional jargon and accreditation as well as assessment of learning, security and logistics. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides data and successful strategies that can be used by planned or implemented programmes in similar socioeconomic contexts in the MENA region.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Sunguya, B. F., Hinthong, W., Jimba, M., & Yasuoka, J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096724 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Farra, A., Zeenny, R., Nasser, S., Asmar, N., Milane, A., Bassil, M., Haidar, M., Habre, M., Zeeni, N., & Hoffart, N.
- Affiliations
- Lebanese American University (LB)
- American University of Beirut (LB)
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal
- Published
- 2018-09-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 09
- Pages
- 914-921
- ISSN
- 1020-3397 (ISSN-L)
- 1687-1634
- OpenAlex
- W2905006918
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Keywords
- interprofessional education, nursing education, pharmacy education, curriculum development, educational leadership, occupational stereotypes, learning assessment, accreditation, Middle East and North Africa, Lebanon
- MeSH terms
- Curriculum, Health Personnel, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Lebanon, Program Evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review