The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 9 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Risiko Aset Teknologi Informasi: Studi kasus Implementasi Manajemen Risiko SPBE Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika Pemerintah Kota Balikpapan
Open accessAbstract
Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik merupakan penyelenggaraan pemerintahan yang memanfaatkan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi untuk memberikan layanan kepada instansi yang menggunakan SPBE. Dari penelitian ditemukan 261 risiko yang diidentifikasi yang dapat dikaitkan dengan risiko SPBE. Implementasi Manajemen risiko peneliti menggunakan Cobit5 for risk, ISO 31000:2018 dan KemenPAN RI No 5 2020 untuk dijadikan pedoman dan analisa terhadap manajemen risiko SPBE. sehingga diharapkan penelitian ini dapat sesuai dengan peraturan dalam penerapan Manajemen Risiko SPBE. Seluruh temuan risiko diberikan rekomendasi dan sistem pengendalian risiko untuk memperkecil level risiko. Budaya atau penerapan manajemen risiko perlu di tingkatkan dan dioptimalkan terutama di bagian Komunikasi dan konsultasi, pencatatan dan pelaporan serta pemantauan dan review yang harus dilakukan secara berkala
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This case study applies PermenPANRB No. 5/2020, COBIT 5 for Risk, and ISO 31000:2018 to assess SPBE information-technology asset risks at Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika Pemerintah Kota Balikpapan. It identifies 261 SPBE assets/risks, with most risks concentrated in data/information and infrastructure categories and two very high risks related to servers and AC.
Key findings
- The study identified 261 SPBE assets: 157 data/information assets, 75 hardware assets, 9 physical assets, 6 business-activity assets, and 14 HR assets. The abstract and conclusion also refer to 261 identified risks that can be linked to SPBE risk.
- Risk categorization produced 7 SPBE risk categories: Data dan Informasi 136, Infrastruktur SPBE 75, Proses Bisnis 20, Keamanan SPBE 2, Layanan SPBE 6, SDM SPBE 14, and Bencana Alam 8. Impact areas were Kinerja 24, Layanan Organisasi 11, and Operasional dan Aset TIK 226.
- Risk levels found were 2 low risks, 59 medium risks, 23 high risks, and 2 very high risks. The two very high risks concerned Server and AC, in the Infrastruktur SPBE risk category and the Operasional Aset TIK impact area.
- For risk action, 176 risks were accepted by the organization, 83 had mitigation plans, and 2 were transferred to another party. The average time needed for risk-handling action plans was 1 year, linked to the local government’s annual budgeting cycle.
Methods
- Case study at Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika Pemerintah Kota Balikpapan, using the SPBE risk-management framework in PermenPANRB No. 5/2020, COBIT 5 for Risk, and ISO 31000:2018. COBIT analysis used the APO domain, specifically APO12 (manage risk) and its subdomains APO12.01–APO12.06.
- Data were collected through direct observation at the agency and interviews with employees, producing risk-identification data and risk assessment for information-technology asset security.
- The paper states six stages but enumerates: literature study; data collection; risk identification and risk analysis; risk evaluation and risk-handling recommendations; and conclusion. Risk scoring used a matrix combining 5 likelihood levels and 5 impact levels, with risk as likelihood × impact.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: some assets may not have been identified because of the study’s limitations.
- Stated in the paper: a risk-aware culture among ASN had not yet grown, so many organizational assets were not recognized as carrying risk.
- Evident from the text: the single-case design at one agency limits generalizability, and reliance on observation and interviews may introduce subjectivity; the paper does not discuss these as limitations.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
14 Own result · 9 Sources not found · 5 Own interpretation · 1 Not checked yet · 1 Own method
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“namun pengelolaan aset TI terutama terkait pengelolaan infrastruktur TI, dan beberapa tata kalola terkait standart keamanan TI belum diberlakukan secara optimal.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“menjadi 7 kategori antara lain: TABEL 4 KATEGORI RISIKO SPBE Kategori Risiko SPBE Jumlah Data dan Informasi 136 Infrastruktur SPBE 75 Proses Bisnis 20 Keamanan SPBE 2 Layanan SPBE 6 SDM SPBE 14 Bencana Alam 8”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“risiko residual yang terdapat pada tabel 7 menyatakan bahwa terdapat risiko yang tersisa dari risiko yang telah ditangani.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“pada dinas komunikasi dan informatika pemerintah kota balikpapan rata-rata membutuhkan waktu 1 tahun dalam penanganan risiko.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“berdasarkan data identifikasi didapatkan 261 aset SPBE di dinas komunikasi dan informatika Pemerintah Kota Balikpapan.”
- Also stated in: § Dinas · plain
“Hasil identifikasi didapatkan 261 aset SPBE di dinas komunikasi dan informatika Pemerintah Kota Balikpapan.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Dinas · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“kedua risiko tersebut berkaitan dengan Server dan AC yang masuk dalam kategori risiko Infrastruktur SPBE dan pada Area dampak Operasional Aset TIK.”
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dari penelitian ditemukan 261 risiko yang diidentifikasi yang dapat dikaitkan dengan risiko SPBE.”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dalam penelitian ini diidentifikasi sebanyak 19 pemangku kepentingan yang terlibat dalam Manajemen Risiko di Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika Pemerintah Kota Balikpapan”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“dari total 261 identifikasi aset yang dilakukan, masih dimungkinkan terdapat aset yang belum teridentifikasi karena keterbatasan penelitian ini.”
hedgedstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Penerapan manajemen risiko pada sektor pemerintah dapat mengurangi munculnya risiko yang dapat memberikan akibat atau dampak yang merugikan bagi organisasi pemerintah (Kurniati, Nugroho, and Rizal 2020).”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Kurniati, Nugroho, and Rizal 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
- It may state two separate claims as one. 11
- Probably not a substantial claim. 11
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hasil penentuan level risiko ditemukan sebanyak 2 risiko dengan level yang rendah, 59 Risiko dengan level sedang, 23 risiko dengan level tinggi, dan Dinas Komunikasi dan informatika Pemerintah kota balikapapn memeiliki 2 risiko dengan level yang Sangat Tinggi”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“yang terdiri dari 157 Aset data/Informasi, 75 aset perangkat keras, dan 9 Aset Fisik, 6 Aset Aktifitas Bisnis dan 14 aset SDM.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika Kota Balikpapan menentukan sebanyak 86 risiko yang akan ditangani sisanya tidak ditangani dari risiko yang levelnya rendah dan sedang, namun untuk risiko yang memiliki level tinggi dan sangat tinggi Dinas komunikasi dan informatika pemerintah kota balikpapan menentukan seluruh risiko akan ditangani.”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“terdapat 176 risiko yang diterima oleh organisasi dengan kata lain organisasi membiarkan risiko terjadi apa adanya, dan terdapat 83 risiko yang memiliki rencana aksi Mitigasi Risiko atau organisasi merencanakan sebuah aktivitas atau tindakan untuk mengurangi kemungkinan dan / atau level dampak dari risiko SPBE.serta ada 2 risiko yang dilakukan transfer risiko”
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“pada penelitian ini didapatkan belum tumbuhnya budaya sadar risiko terhadap ASN sehingga terdapat banyak aset organiasasi yang belum disadari bahwa aset tersebut memiliki risiko terhadap organisasi.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“TABEL 5 DAMPAK RISIKO SPBE Area Dampak Jumlah Kinerja 24 Layanan Organisasi 11 Operasional dan Aset TIK 226”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Prinsip utama dari penerapan manajemen risiko SPBE adalah meningkatkan nilai tambah dan perlindungan bagi Pemerintah Kota Balikpapan dalam menerapkan SPBE dengan mengimplementasikan kerangka kerja manajemen risiko SPBE sesuai dengan Permenpanrb No 5 tahun 2020 tentang pedkoman manajemen risiko SPBE.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites PermenPANRB No 5 Tahun 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Pada ISO 31000:2018, pada tahapan penilaian risiko memiliki 3 (tiga) sub tahapan yaitu identifikasi risiko, analisis risiko dan evaluasi risiko.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites ISO 31000:2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Manajemen risiko tertanam di seluruh kerangka COBIT 5[1].”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [1]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“APO12 memiliki 6 subdomain antara lain : APO12.01Collect Data / mengumpulkan data terkait risiko. APO12.02Analyse Risk / Menganalisis risiko atau mengembangkan resiko. APO12.03Maintain A Risk Profile / Mememlihara atau Menjaga profil risiko APO12.04Articulate Risk / Mengkomunikasikan risiko. APO12.05Define a Risk Management Action Portofolio / Mendefinisikan portfolio tindakan Manajemen”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A statement the paper makes itself — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Terjadi kesamaan antara COBIT5 for risk dan ISO 31000 dalam perhitungan Risiko, kedua framework dan standart tersebut menentukan risiko sebagai perkalian antara level kemungkinan (risk likelihood) dan level dampak (risk impact)”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A statement the paper makes itself — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Pendekatan Manajemen Risiko pada COBIT5 for Risk selaras dengan Manajemen Risiko pada ISO 31000, bermula dari identifikasi skenario risiko negatif dan positif berdasarkan kategori generik yang disesuaikan dengan konteks.”
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Pada COBIT5 for risk memiliki dua perpektif mengenai cara penanganan risiko, yang pertama adalah Perspektif manajemen risiko dengan melihat tata kelola risiko inti dan proses manajemen risiko dan skenario risiko.Perspektif ini menjelaskan bagaimana risiko dapat dimitigasi dengan menggunakan COBIT 5 enabler.Perpektif kedua adalah perspektif risiko menjelaskan bagaimana membangun dan mempertahankan”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [2]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Komponen dasar dari kerangka kerja manajemen risiko SPBE terdiri atas prinsip mengenai peningkatan nilai dan perlindungan, kepemimpinan dan komitmen, serta proses dan tata kelola manajemen risiko.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites PermenPANRB No 5 Tahun 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
A statement the paper makes itself — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Dinas komunikasi dan informatika adalah lembaga dibawah pemrintah daerah yang memiliki siklus penganggaran satu tahun, sehingga membutuhkan waktu untuk memulai perencanaan hingga realisasi sesuai silkus pengaggaran di pemerintah.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Kerangka kerja COBIT5 for Risk mengidentifikasi 20 kategori yang mengandung 112 skenario risiko TI generik yang kemudian disesuaikan dengan konteks SPBE di indonesia sehingga menjadi 16 kategori [3].”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Penerapan Manajemen risiko SPBE juga memjadikan organisasi Dinas Komunikasi dan Informatika Pemerintah Kota Balikpapan patuh dalam penerapan SPBE dan menciptakan budaya sadar risiko dalam penerapan SPBE.”
plainstates a causeSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A statement the paper makes itself — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ada 2 proses khusus: satu di domain tata kelola (Evaluate, Direct and Monitor [EDM]) dan di domain manajemen (Align, Plan and Organize [APO]), yang memastikan optimasi risiko (EDM03) dan Pengelolaan Risiko (APO12), masing-masing.”
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“proses yang terdapat pada penerapan ISO 31000 manajemen risiko adalah: 1. Penentuan Konteks Risiko; 2. Identifikasi Risiko; 3. Analisis Risiko; 4. Evaluasi Risiko; 5.Penanganan Risiko; 6. Komunikasi dan Konsultasi; 7. Monitoring dan Review.”
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites ISO 31000:2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper relies on this without support.
Pemerintah Kota Balikpapan has not implemented risk management for the problems that occur.
“Pemerintah Kota Balikpapan belum memiliki penerapan manajemen risiko dalam permasalahan yang terjadi.”
The paper relies on this without support.
IT assets are an important part of an institution.
“Aset teknologi informasi merupakan bagian penting dari sebuah instansi.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Threats and attacks on IT assets from inside and outside can create large risks in government institutions and can disrupt ongoing business processes or even stop them.
“Jika aset TI mendapat ancaman dan serangan dari dalam dan luar, dapat menimbulkan risiko besar di instansi pemerintah itu sendiri dan dapat mengganggu proses bisnis yang sedang berjalan bahkan dapat dihentikan.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The existence of risk management can minimize the occurrence of risks that can have a large impact on the institution.
“Dengan adanya manajemen risiko dapat meminimalisir terjadinya risiko yang dapat berdampak besar bagi instansi.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated major: it would touch a result — a value a result rests on, reported and recomputed p-values on opposite sides of the significance level, two passages that conflict with no sign which is right, or a cited work retracted before this paper was published.
In the paper
§ Dinas
“menentukan sebanyak 86 risiko yang akan ditangani sisanya tidak ditangani dari risiko yang levelnya rendah dan sedang”
§ Dinas
“Hasil penentuan level risiko ditemukan sebanyak 2 risiko dengan level yang rendah, 59 Risiko dengan level sedang, 23 risiko dengan level tinggi”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Dinas
“pada PermenPAN RB penetapan konteks terdiri dari 7 Tahapan yaitu : a. Informasi Umum”
§ Dinas
“j.Selera Risiko SPBE Sebagai acuan dalam pentuan ambang batas minimum”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Dinas
“Penelitian ini menggunakan 6 tahapan antara lain : 1. Studi Literatur”
§ Dinas
“5. kesimpulan III.HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN”
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- IT Risk Management Based on COBIT 5 for Risk at Deutsche Telekom AG -ISACA (2018) [Online], https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca- journal/issues/2018/volume-3/it-risk-management-based-on-cobit-5- for-risk-at-deutsche-telekom-ag
- Aprianto K., Endroyono, Supeno Mardi S.H. 2021. " E-Government Risk Management Analysis Using COBIT 5 For Risk and ISO 31000:2018 in Magetan Regency" Jurnal IPTEK-KOM (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Komunikasi) eISSN 2527 -4902 Vol. 23 No. 2, Desember 2021: 107 - 123
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DIGITALISASI ARSIP DALAM MENDUKUNG PELAKSANAAN E-GOVERNMENT
Lolytasari, L., & Dirsanala, A. (2023) · Shaut Al-Maktabah Jurnal Perpustakaan Arsip dan Dokumentasi · doi:10.37108/shaut.v15i1.963 · Cited by 18
Puspitaningrum, A. C., Fitrani, L. D., & Sintiya, E. S. (2024) · SISTEMASI · doi:10.32520/stmsi.v13i1.3639 · Cited by 8
A Local Government Application Capability Level Information System Audit using COBIT 5 Framework
Andika, B. D., Sucipto, S., & Nugroho, A. (2023) · Journal of Innovation Information Technology and Application (JINITA) · doi:10.35970/jinita.v5i2.1971 · Cited by 6
Zulfitra, S. R., & Ayuningtyas, A. (2023) · Jurnal Teknologi dan Informasi · doi:10.34010/jati.v13i2.9484 · Cited by 5
Algiffary, M. A., Cholil, W., Tjahjanto, Kunang, Y. N., Amin, Z., & Prihandoko, P. (2024) · International Conference on Informatics, Multimedia, Cyber and Information System (ICIMCIS) · doi:10.1109/icimcis63449.2024.10957083 · Cited by 4
Penggunaan Metode FMEA dalam Penilaian Manajemen Risiko Keamanan Sistem Informasi Rumah Sakit
Saputri, S. N., Salisah, F. N., Maita, I., & Rozanda, N. E. (2024) · INOVTEK Polbeng - Seri Informatika · doi:10.35314/isi.v9i1.3951 · Cited by 4
Chaidir, J., & Haerofiatna, H. (2023) · International Journal of Community and Cooperative Studies · doi:10.37745/ijccs.2014/vol11n11725 · Cited by 3
Ciptaningtyas, H. T., Ginardi, R. V. H., Aliski, A. D., Caronongan, D. C., & Santoso, M. (2024) · International Conference on Computer Engineering, Network, and Intelligent Multimedia (CENIM) · doi:10.1109/cenim64038.2024.10882844 · Cited by 2
Penerapan Audit Sistem Informasi pada Instansi Pemerintah dengan Framework COBIT: Literatur Review
Oktafiani, R., Nurrizki, M. A., Suhirman, S., & Sutarman, S. (2023) · Jurnal Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi dan Manajemen (JATIM) · doi:10.31102/jatim.v4i1.1887 · Cited by 2
Analisis Kesiapan Penyelenggaraan SPBE di Kabupaten Sindereng Rappang
Juniyengsi, V. (2024) · Jurnal Sosial Humaniora. · doi:10.70214/vgpatb18 · Cited by 2
Implementasi ISO 27001:2022 dalam Manajemen Risiko Keamanan Informasi
Arumdiya, F. C., & Rudianto, C. (2025) · JURNAL PETISI (Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi) · doi:10.36232/jurnalpetisi.v6i2.2012 · Cited by 2
Electronic-based Governance System Risk Management in Serang District
Haerofiatna, H., & Chaidir, J. (2023) · International Journal of Business and Management Review · doi:10.37745/ijbmr.2013/vol11n55766 · Cited by 2
Fahlevi, M. F., Nasution, A. H., Riski, R., Chrisnadeva, A. F., & Haryanti, D. W. H. (2026) · Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi · doi:10.51903/0pxz8r62 · Cited by 1
Perancangan Manajemen Risiko Operasional Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik
Putri, V. A., Pradnyana, I. M. A., & Indradewi, I. G. A. A. D. (2025) · Jurnal Teknik Informatika dan Sistem Informasi · doi:10.28932/jutisi.v11i2.11394 · Cited by 1
Juliharta, I. G. P. K., Dewi, P. A. C., & Widiari, N. P. (2023) · Jurnal TAM (Technology Acceptance Model) · doi:10.56327/jurnaltam.v14i2.1557 · Cited by 1
Pendampingan Manajemen Risiko Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik Pemerintah Kota XYZ
Hutama, R. R., Susanto, T. D., Nadlifatin, R., Subriadi, A. P., Sholiq, S., Muqtadiroh, F. A., & Ali, A. H. N. (2024) · Reswara Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat · doi:10.46576/rjpkm.v5i2.4181
MANAJEMEN RISIKO TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI MENGGUNAKAN COBIT 5
Putri, R. M. A., Murniati, W., Ashari, M., & Ashari, H. (2024) · Jurnal Informatika Teknologi dan Sains (Jinteks) · doi:10.51401/jinteks.v6i3.4780
Alamsyah, M. R., & Rolliawati, D. (2025) · JATI (Jurnal Mahasiswa Teknik Informatika) · doi:10.36040/jati.v9i1.12236
Dwi Erlangga (2024) · Analisis Harga Pokok Produksi Rumah Pada (UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta)
HALAL CERTIFICATION INTEGRATION OF SUPPLY CHAIN RISK MANAGEMENT IN ICHIPS BANANA MSMES IN SUMENEP
Aliyah, S., Suprapti, I., & Destiarni, R. P. (2025) · Proceeding of Annual Conference on Islamic Economy and Law · doi:10.21107/aciel.v3i1.573
Metadata
- Authors
- Bisma, R.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Negeri Surabaya (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Bisma, Rahadian
- ORCID
- Bisma, Rahadian
- Venue
- Journal of Information Engineering and Educational Technology
- Publisher
- Universitas Negeri Surabaya
- Published
- 2022-12-24
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 73-79
- ISSN
- 2549-869X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4312176348
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- id
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Information Engineering and Educational Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Keywords
- e-government, risk management, risk identification, risk control, ISO 31000, risk management guidelines, Balikpapan
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
