Cited by 41English Language Learning and TeachingEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningForeign Language Teaching Methods

EFEKTIVITAS PENGGUNAAN MEDIA YOUTUBE BERBASIS VARIOUS APPROACHES DALAM MENINGKATKAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR BAHASA INGGRIS

Open access
Yusri, Yusri, Rosida, Ana, Jufri, Jufri, R, Mantasiah·2018·Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of using youtube media based on various approaches in improving the learning motivation of English learners. This research is a classroom action research. Data collection techniques used in this study consisted of observations and questionnaires. The subjects in this study were 35 people. This research was carried out in two cycles, each meeting held two meetings. In the initial test, the average learning motivation was 33.74, in the first cycle was 41.25 and in the second cycle was 48.28. Therefore, if we compare it from the initial test to the second cycle test. There is an increase of 14.54. This shows that the use of youtube media has an effect on increasing students' motivation to learn English.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.26858/eralingua.v2i2.6760

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • YouTube videos should be considered as effective teaching resources in increasing student's academic motivation.

    “However, the recent study conducted by Yusri, Rosida, Jufri, and Mantasiah (2018) recommended that YouTube videos should be considered as effective teaching resources in increasing student's academic motivation.”

    From Teaching and Learning Science Using YouTube Videos and Discovery Learning in Primary School (2020) · cites this paper as Yusri, Rosida, Jufri, and Mantasiah (2018)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Authors
Yusri, Y., Rosida, A., Jufri, J., & R, M.
Affiliations
  • Universitas Fajar (ID)
  • State University of Makassar (ID)
Venue
Eralingua: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra
Published
2018-08-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 2549-7359 (ISSN-L)
  • 2579-4574
OpenAlex
W2898279750
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Eralingua Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Asing dan Sastra (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Foreign Language Teaching Methods
Keywords
YouTube, instructional media, student motivation, English language learning, teaching methods, video-based learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review