Cited by 147Forest Management and PolicyForest ecology and managementSeedling growth and survival studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prescribing regeneration treatments for mixed-oak forests in the Mid-Atlantic region

Abstract

Includes guidelines for using the SILVAH decision-support system to perpetuate oak forests in the Mid-Atlantic region. Six chapters provide information on values of oak forests, inventory methods, key decision variables, decision charts, and silvicultural prescriptions, as well as guidance on fostering young stands. Sample tally sheets and SILVAH computer printouts are included in the Appendix.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2737/nrs-gtr-33

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Brose, P. H., Gottschalk, K. W., Horsley, S. B., Knopp, P. D., Kochenderfer, J. N., McGuinness, B. J., Miller, G. W., Ristau, T. E., Stoleson, S. H., & Stout, S. L.
Published
2008
OpenAlex
W1512519754
Cited by
141
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest Management and Policy
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Forest ecology and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Seedling growth and survival studies
Keywords
oak mixed forests, forest regeneration, silvicultural prescriptions, forest inventory methods, Mid-Atlantic region

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review