The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
FIREMON: Fire effects monitoring and inventory system
Abstract
Monitoring and inventory to assess the effects of wildland fire is critical for 1) documenting fire effects, 2) assessing ecosystem damage and benefit, 3) evaluating the success or failure of a burn, and 4) appraising the potential for future treatments. However, monitoring fire effects is often difficult because data collection requires abundant funds, resources, and sampling experience. Often, the reason fire monitoring projects are not implemented is because fire management agencies do not have scientifically based, standardized protocols for inventorying pre- and postfire conditions that satisfy their monitoring and management objectives. We have developed a comprehensive system, called the Fire Effects Monitoring and Inventory System (FIREMON), which is designed to satisfy fire management agencies' monitoring and inventory requirements for most ecosystems, fuel types, and geographic areas in the United States. FIREMON consists of standardized sampling methods and manuals, field forms, database, analysis program, and an image analysis guide so that fire managers can 1) design a fire effects monitoring project, 2) collect and store the sampled data, 3) statistically analyze and summarize the data, 4) link the data with satellite imagery, and 5) map the sampled data across the landscape using image processing. FIREMON allows flexible but comprehensive sampling of fire effects so data can be evaluated for significant impacts, shared across agencies, and used to update and refine fire management plans and prescriptions. FIREMON has a flexible structure that allows the modification of sampling methods and local code fields to allow the sampling of locally important fire effects evaluation criteria.More information: https://www.frames.gov/partner-sites/firemon/firemon-home/
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator-model development and evaluation
Finney, M. A. (1998) · doi:10.2737/rmrs-rp-4 · Cited by 1,617
Cited by
Miller, J. D., Safford, H. D., Crimmins, M., & Thode, A. E. (2009) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-008-9201-9 · Cited by 747
A New Metric for Quantifying Burn Severity: The Relativized Burn Ratio
Parks, S., Dillon, G., & Miller, C. (2014) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs6031827 · Cited by 448
Reinhardt, E. D., Keane, R. E., Calkin, D. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.016 · Cited by 349
Self-citationThe ecological importance of severe wildfires: Some like it hot
Hutto, R. L. (2008) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/08-0895.1 · Cited by 216
Lydersen, J. M., North, M. P., & Collins, B. M. (2014) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.005 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Lutes, D. C., Keane, R. E., Caratti, J. F., Key, C. H., Benson, N. C., Sutherland, S., & Gangi, L. J.
- Published
- 2006
- OpenAlex
- W1413645801
- Cited by
- 843
- References
- 1
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: FIREMON: Fire effects monitoring and inventory system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2737/rmrs-gtr-164
- The paper
- Lutes, D. C., Keane, R. E., Caratti, J. F., Key, C. H., Benson, N. C., Sutherland, S., & Gangi, L. J. (2006). FIREMON: Fire effects monitoring and inventory system. https://doi.org/10.2737/rmrs-gtr-164
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.