Cited by 0Turtle Biology and ConservationFish Ecology and Management StudiesAmphibian and Reptile Biology

Home Range and Habitat Selection of the Suwannee Alligator Snapping Turtle (Macrochelys suwanniensis) in the Suwannee River, Florida

Open access
Thomas, Travis M., Enge, Kevin M., Suarez, Eric, Schueller, Paul, Bankovich, Brittany, Leone, Erin H.·2024·Chelonian Conservation and Biology

Abstract

Effective management of a species requires that resource managers know critical aspects of its ecology, including information on home range and habitat use. We conducted the first telemetry study on the Suwannee alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys suwanniensis), and we examined movements at an upper river (UR) site and a lower river (LR) site in the Suwannee River in Florida, USA. We estimated home range size with kernel density estimates (KDE) using the FishTracker GIS toolbox, and we examined potential differences in KDEs with Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). We also used GLMs (family = binomial) to examine habitat selection for M. suwanniensis. We used an information-theoretic approach to rank and select the most parsimonious models. Overall, our models revealed that M. suwanniensis possessed larger 90% KDEs in the LR site than the UR site, and in both sites, turtles moved into the floodplain during flooded conditions. Remarkably, these movements continued even after water levels receded and the aquatic links were severed. Interestingly, M. suwanniensis selected shallow water with some type of subsurface cover, especially large woody debris (LWD). Instream LWD is likely extremely important, especially during low water levels when undercut banks and other bank habitats are unavailable, so the removal of LWD, including deadhead logs, could negatively affect the species. Minimum flows have been established in the drainage, but river water levels have declined an estimated 40% since human settlement, partly because of groundwater withdrawal outside the drainage, potentially imperiling this state Threatened species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2744/ccb-1583.1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37

Authors
Thomas, T. M., Enge, K. M., Suarez, E., Schueller, P., Bankovich, B., & Leone, E. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (US)
Venue
Chelonian Conservation and Biology
Published
2024-01-17
Volume
22
Issue
2
ISSN
1071-8443 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391695174
Cited by
0
References
37
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Chelonian Conservation and Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Turtle Biology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Keywords
home range, habitat selection, Suwannee River, telemetry, large woody debris, water level decline, groundwater pumping, threatened species, river management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review