Cited by 57Veterinary Equine Medical ResearchVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaVeterinary Medicine and Surgery

Equine thoracoscopy: normal anatomy and surgical technique

PERONI, J. F., HORNER, N. T., ROBINSON, N. E., STICK, J. A.·2001·Equine Veterinary Journal

Abstract

Six normal, healthy horses age 3-10 years underwent left and right thoracoscopic examination using a rigid telescope. A minimum of 30 days was allowed between procedures. Horses were restrained in stocks and sedated with a continuous detomidine infusion. After surgical preparation of the hemithorax elected for surgery, and administration of local or regional anaesthesia of the surgery sites, thoracoscopy was completed during two 15 min pneumothorax periods. During the procedures, the thoracic structures were viewed using a 57 cm, 10 mm diameter, 30 degrees rigid telescope connected to a digital camcorder to allow computer capture of digital images. The telescope was inserted into the thoracic cavity via 3 different intercostal spaces. The 8th, 10th and 12th intercostal spaces were randomly selected and used among horses. The exploration of each hemithorax started from the dorsal-caudal quadrant continued toward the cranial thorax and was completed by observing the diaphragmatic and caudal pulmonary region. Collapsed lung, aorta, oesophagus and diaphragm were viewed readily in either hemithorax. On exploration of the right hemithorax, the azygos vein, thoracic duct and pulmonary veins were also identified. Horses tolerated thoracoscopy well. Signs of discomfort, such as increased respiratory rate, coughing and decreased level of sedation, were associated with lung collapse in one horse, with pneumothorax on 2 occasions, and when the thorax was approached through the 8th interc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2746/042516401776249688

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PERONI, J. F., HORNER, N. T., ROBINSON, N. E., & STICK, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Equine Veterinary Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-05
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
231-237
ISSN
  • 0425-1644 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-3306
OpenAlex
W2002425845
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Equine Veterinary Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Equine › Veterinary Equine Medical Research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
Keywords
horses, thoracic anatomy, thoracic surgery, intercostal approach, pneumothorax, azygos vein, thoracic duct, pulmonary veins, diaphragm, esophagus, aorta, sedation
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Horses, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Imidazoles, Male, Pneumothorax, Artificial, Thoracoscopy, Thoracoscopes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review