The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Geochronological Constraints on the Paleoproterozoic Evolution of the North China Craton: SHRIMP Zircon Ages of Different Types of Mafic Dikes
Abstract
Widespread magmatic and metamorphic events during the interval 2350-1650 Ma suggest that the North China craton (NCC) may have been involved in the evolution of the supercontinent Columbia. Metamorphosed and unmetamorphosed dikes have been characterized in terms of their geochemistry and geochronology. Dike suite 1 in the northern Wutai-Fuping terrane comprises amphibolite-facies assemblages and has a SHRIMP U-Pb zircon crystallization age of 2147 ± 5 Ma. Dike suite 2, distributed in the northern part of the Huai'an-Fengzhen terrane, has a two-pyroxene granulite assemblage, and yields a SHRIMP metamorphic zircon age of 1929 ± 8 Ma. Dike suite 3 in the Sanggan structural zone between the two terranes is composed of garnet two-pyroxene granulites, and has a SHRIMP zircon age of 1973 ± 4 Ma for the cores and 1834 ± 5 Ma for the rims, defining the time of crystallization and peak metamorphism, respectively. Dike suites 1 and 2 were possibly emplaced close to a continental margin and an arc respectively; whereas dike suite 3 was most likely post-orogenic. Zircon grains from an unmetamorphosed mafic dike in the north-central NCC yields a SHRIMP crystallization age of 1778 ± 3 Ma. We suggest that the metamorphosed mafic dike suites probably resulted from the amalgamation of the NCC in the Columbia supercontinent between 2080 and 1980 Ma (~2000 Ma), whereas the unmetamorphosed mafic dike swarms probably was emplaced during its break-up at 1780-1750 Ma. The metamorphosed dikes were likely uplifted and exhumed during a plume-driven upwelling event during 1830-1750 Ma, causing intrusion of (unmetamorphosed) dikes throughout the NCC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
User's Manual for Isoplot 3.00 - A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel
Ludwig, K. R. (2003) · Cited by 7,734
Tectonic setting of basic volcanic rocks determined using trace element analyses
Pearce, J. A., & Cann, J. R. (1973) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/0012-821x(73)90129-5 · Cited by 3,520
(2018) · American Mineralogist · doi:10.2138/am-2019- · Cited by 3,453
U-Th-Pb Geochronology by Ion Microprobe
Williams, I. S. (1997) · doi:10.5382/rev.07.01 · Cited by 2,683
Zhao, G., Wilde, S. A., Cawood, P. A., & Sun, M. (2001) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/s0301-9268(00)00154-6 · Cited by 1,916
Review of global 2.1–1.8 Ga orogens: implications for a pre-Rodinia supercontinent
Zhao, G., Cawood, P. A., Wilde, S. A., & Sun, M. (2002) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0012-8252(02)00073-9 · Cited by 1,670
Configuration of Columbia, a Mesoproterozoic Supercontinent
Rogers, J. J. W., & Santosh, M. (2002) · Gondwana Research · doi:10.1016/s1342-937x(05)70883-2 · Cited by 1,397
Re–Os evidence for replacement of ancient mantle lithosphere beneath the North China craton
Gao, S., Rudnick, R. L., Carlson, R. W., McDonough, W. F., & Liu, Y.-S. (2002) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/s0012-821x(02)00489-2 · Cited by 897
Paleoproterozoic tectonic evolution of the North China Craton
Kusky, T. M., & Li, J. (2003) · Journal of Asian Earth Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1367-9120(03)00071-3 · Cited by 893
Kröner, A., Wilde, S. A., Li, J. H., & Wang, K. Y. (2005) · Journal of Asian Earth Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2004.01.001 · Cited by 599
Cited by
The early Precambrian odyssey of the North China Craton: A synoptic overview
Zhai, M.-G., & Santosh, M. (2011) · Gondwana Research · doi:10.1016/j.gr.2011.02.005 · Cited by 1,692
Self-citationGuo, J., Peng, P., Chen, Y., Jiao, S., & Windley, B. F. (2012) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2011.07.020 · Cited by 320
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, P., Zhai, M., Zhang, H., & Guo, J.
- Venue
- International Geology Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 492-508
- ISSN
- 0020-6814 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-2839
- OpenAlex
- W2097292339
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geochronological Constraints on the Paleoproterozoic Evolution of the North China Craton: SHRIMP Zircon Ages of Different Types of Mafic Dikes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2747/0020-6814.47.5.492
- The paper
- Peng, P., Zhai, M., Zhang, H., & Guo, J. (2005). Geochronological Constraints on the Paleoproterozoic Evolution of the North China Craton: SHRIMP Zircon Ages of Different Types of Mafic Dikes. International Geology Review. https://doi.org/10.2747/0020-6814.47.5.492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.