Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Geochronological Constraints on the Paleoproterozoic Evolution of the North China Craton: SHRIMP Zircon Ages of Different Types of Mafic Dikes

Peng, Peng, Zhai, Mingguo, Zhang, Huafeng, Guo, Jinghui·2005·International Geology Review

Abstract

Widespread magmatic and metamorphic events during the interval 2350-1650 Ma suggest that the North China craton (NCC) may have been involved in the evolution of the supercontinent Columbia. Metamorphosed and unmetamorphosed dikes have been characterized in terms of their geochemistry and geochronology. Dike suite 1 in the northern Wutai-Fuping terrane comprises amphibolite-facies assemblages and has a SHRIMP U-Pb zircon crystallization age of 2147 ± 5 Ma. Dike suite 2, distributed in the northern part of the Huai'an-Fengzhen terrane, has a two-pyroxene granulite assemblage, and yields a SHRIMP metamorphic zircon age of 1929 ± 8 Ma. Dike suite 3 in the Sanggan structural zone between the two terranes is composed of garnet two-pyroxene granulites, and has a SHRIMP zircon age of 1973 ± 4 Ma for the cores and 1834 ± 5 Ma for the rims, defining the time of crystallization and peak metamorphism, respectively. Dike suites 1 and 2 were possibly emplaced close to a continental margin and an arc respectively; whereas dike suite 3 was most likely post-orogenic. Zircon grains from an unmetamorphosed mafic dike in the north-central NCC yields a SHRIMP crystallization age of 1778 ± 3 Ma. We suggest that the metamorphosed mafic dike suites probably resulted from the amalgamation of the NCC in the Columbia supercontinent between 2080 and 1980 Ma (~2000 Ma), whereas the unmetamorphosed mafic dike swarms probably was emplaced during its break-up at 1780-1750 Ma. The metamorphosed dikes were likely uplifted and exhumed during a plume-driven upwelling event during 1830-1750 Ma, causing intrusion of (unmetamorphosed) dikes throughout the NCC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2747/0020-6814.47.5.492

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Peng, P., Zhai, M., Zhang, H., & Guo, J.
Venue
International Geology Review
Published
2005-05
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
492-508
ISSN
  • 0020-6814 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2839
OpenAlex
W2097292339
Cited by
309
References
30
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Geochronological Constraints on the Paleoproterozoic Evolution of the North China Craton: SHRIMP Zircon Ages of Different Types of Mafic Dikes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2747/0020-6814.47.5.492
The paper
Peng, P., Zhai, M., Zhang, H., & Guo, J. (2005). Geochronological Constraints on the Paleoproterozoic Evolution of the North China Craton: SHRIMP Zircon Ages of Different Types of Mafic Dikes. International Geology Review. https://doi.org/10.2747/0020-6814.47.5.492

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.