Domestic Dogs as Facilitators in Social Interaction: An Evaluation of Helping and Courtship Behaviors
Abstract
Previous studies have suggested that dogs facilitate social interaction between humans. Furthermore, the nature of social interaction is limited to nonverbal behavior such as smiling or gazing or to commonplace conversations. Four studies were carried out in field settings in order to explore if dogs can facilitate closer relationships. In the first experiment, a male confederate (accompanied or not by a dog) solicited people for money in the street. The second experiment was the same except that a female confederate was used. In a third experiment, a male confederate (with or without a dog) accidentally dropped some coins on the ground, to see if people would help him pick them up. In the fourth experiment, a male confederate (with or without a dog) solicited young women in the street for their phone numbers. Results show that the presence of the dog was associated with a higher rate of helping behavior (experiments 1, 2, 3) and higher compliance with the request of the confederate (experiment 4). The influence of a domestic dog as a facilitator to create affiliation and relations in social interaction is discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Animal presence makes strangers and therapists seem more trustworthy and makes people feel more safe and comfortable disclosing.
“Animal presence makes strangers and therapists seem more trustworthy and makes people feel more safe and comfortable disclosing [53–55].”
From Incorporating animal-assisted therapy in mental health treatments for adolescents: A systematic review of canine assisted psychotherapy (2019) · cites this paper as [54]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 130
- Authors
- Guéguen, N., & Ciccotti, S.
- Affiliations
- Université de Bretagne Sud (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Guéguen, Nicolas
- ORCID
- Guéguen, Nicolas
- Venue
- Anthrozoös
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 339-349
- ISSN
- 0892-7936 (ISSN-L)
- 1753-0377
- OpenAlex
- W1995699974
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Anthrozoös (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
- Keywords
- dogs, human-dog interaction, social facilitation, helping behavior, courtship behavior, social affiliation, prosocial behavior, gender differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review