Cited by 130Human-Animal Interaction StudiesSocial Robot Interaction and HRIPsychology of Social Influence

Domestic Dogs as Facilitators in Social Interaction: An Evaluation of Helping and Courtship Behaviors

Guéguen, Nicolas, Ciccotti, Serge·2008·Anthrozoös

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested that dogs facilitate social interaction between humans. Furthermore, the nature of social interaction is limited to nonverbal behavior such as smiling or gazing or to commonplace conversations. Four studies were carried out in field settings in order to explore if dogs can facilitate closer relationships. In the first experiment, a male confederate (accompanied or not by a dog) solicited people for money in the street. The second experiment was the same except that a female confederate was used. In a third experiment, a male confederate (with or without a dog) accidentally dropped some coins on the ground, to see if people would help him pick them up. In the fourth experiment, a male confederate (with or without a dog) solicited young women in the street for their phone numbers. Results show that the presence of the dog was associated with a higher rate of helping behavior (experiments 1, 2, 3) and higher compliance with the request of the confederate (experiment 4). The influence of a domestic dog as a facilitator to create affiliation and relations in social interaction is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2752/175303708x371564

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 130

Authors
Guéguen, N., & Ciccotti, S.
Affiliations
Université de Bretagne Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Guéguen, Nicolas
Venue
Anthrozoös
Published
2008-12
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
339-349
ISSN
  • 0892-7936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1753-0377
OpenAlex
W1995699974
Cited by
130
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Anthrozoös (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
dogs, human-dog interaction, social facilitation, helping behavior, courtship behavior, social affiliation, prosocial behavior, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review