The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comprehensive Model of Perceived Risk of E-Commerce Transactions
Abstract
Perceived risk is an important construct in e-commerce research, but it has not been approached in a manner sufficiently systematic, comprehensive, or detailed to be understood along multiple dimensions instructive for information systems designers. This paper fills the gap by proposing a model of perceived risk based on a well-established marketing theory of risk. It identifies events that expose consumers to harm in e-commerce transactions and measures the dimensions of perceived risk with rigorously developed formative indicators that incorporate the almost unlimited range of unwanted events of potential concern to consumers. This risk construct is placed in a nomological network and tested through an on-line field study of 411 participants aggregated with structural equation modeling. Test results show that the construct e-commerce transaction perceived risk is an aggregate factor with three dimensions: risk of functionality inefficiency, risk of information misuse, and risk of failure to gain product benefit.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Lots of empirical studies have utilized the perceived risk as an important factor in e-commerce and identified its impact on loyalty, decision making and purchase intentions [70-72].”
From Investigating the Impact of Critical Factors on Continuance Intention towards Cross-Border Shopping Websites (2019) · cites this paper as [72]
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192 · Cited by 9,150
Self-citationTrust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
(2003) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275 · Cited by 5,715
Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology
McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81 · Cited by 5,550
Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development
Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845 · Cited by 4,852
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148781 · Cited by 3,921
Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective
Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/s1071-5819(03)00111-3 · Cited by 3,351
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- D. Barclay, 1995, The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration, Technology Studies, 2, 285
- 1967, Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior
- B. Xiao, 2007, Consumer decision support systems for e-commerce: Design and adoption of product recommendation agents, MIS Quarterly, 31, 317
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sullivan, Y. W., & Kim, D. J. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.008 · Cited by 443
Price Fluctuations and the Use of Bitcoin: An Empirical Inquiry
Polasik, M., Piotrowska, A. I., Wisniewski, T. P., Kotkowski, R., & Lightfoot, G. (2015) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2016.1061413 · Cited by 418
Pillai, S. G., Kim, W. G., Haldorai, K., & Kim, H. (2022) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103275 · Cited by 248
Privacy concerns and online purchasing behaviour: Towards an integrated model
Fortes, N., & Rita, P. (2016) · European Research on Management and Business Economics · doi:10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.04.002 · Cited by 212
-, S. M., Jayashree, S., Rezaei, S., Kasım, A., & Okumuş, F. (2016) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2016.1200539 · Cited by 212
Metadata
- Authors
- Glover, S., & Benbasat, I.
- Affiliations
- Royal Roads University (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- ORCID
- Benbasat, Izak
- Venue
- International Journal of Electronic Commerce
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 47-78
- ISSN
- 1086-4415 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9301
- OpenAlex
- W1972903596
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 18.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Electronic Commerce (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Keywords
- risk perception, e-commerce transactions, consumer risk perception, risk dimensions, formative indicators, nomological network, consumer harm
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
