What Is Transparency?
Abstract
This article examines the evolving definition of transparency from a postmodernist approach. It traces the meaning of transparency from its use by nongovernmental and supranational organizations to its use in the international relations, nonprofit, public policy, and administration literature. It finds that the definition of transparency reveals three metaphors: transparency as a public value embraced by society to counter corruption, transparency synonymous with open decision-making by governments and nonprofits, and transparency as a complex tool of good governance in programs, policies, organizations, and nations. In the first metaphor, transparency is subtly intertwined with accountability. In the second, as transparency encourages openness, it increases concerns for secrecy and privacy. In the third, policymakers create transparency alongside accountability, efficiency, and effectiveness. The analysis concludes that these meanings affect the way organization members conduct and will conduct their day-to-day activities and how policies are and will be created. Transparency is becoming an unofficial mandate by the public and is often a legal mandate.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transparency is a value in the policy process associated with both throughput and output legitimacy.
“Transparency is thus a value in the policy process associated with both throughput and output legitimacy (cf. Ball,2009).”
From Research on digital discretion—The subjectification of street‐level work in public administration (2025) · cites this paper as Ball,2009
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 48 · Cited by 376
- Authors
- Ball, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Maine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ball, Carolyn
- Venue
- Public Integrity
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-09-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 293-308
- ISSN
- 1099-9922 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025818602
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 22.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Integrity (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Administrative Law and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
- Keywords
- transparency, postmodernism, accountability, good governance, corruption, public policy, nonprofit organizations, international relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review