Cited by 75Public Policy and Administration ResearchLocal Government Finance and DecentralizationPublic Policy and Governance

Citizen Participation in the Budget Process and Local Government Accountability: Case Studies of Organizational Learning from the United States and South Korea

Open access
Kim, Soojin, Schachter, Hindy Lauer·2013·Public Performance & Management Review

Abstract

Citizen participation in budgeting can be a governmental mechanism to minimize organizational learning pathologies resulting from sole reliance on an administrative accountability model. This study analyzes case studies of Los Angeles and Bukgu, South Korea, to show how participative budgeting combines exploration and refinement strategies to create processes that foster information exchange between citizens and public officials. Although the analysis finds representativeness problems in both cases, scholars, administrators, and citizen advocates should have an interest in the narratives on how cities construct and refine processes that can improve citizen-administrator information exchange.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2753/pmr1530-9576360304

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participatory budgeting increases trust in government at the local level.

    “Perhaps the most beneficial impact of PB in terms of government benefits are the consistent findings that it increases trust in government at the local level (Ebdon and Franklin 2006;Johnson et al. 2021;Kim and Schachter 2013;Swaner 2017;Wilkinson et al. 2019;Yang and Pandey 2011).”

    From Participatory Budgeting for Social Equity: A Comparative Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Kim and Schachter 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, S., & Schachter, H. L.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • New Jersey Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Public Performance & Management Review
Published
2013-03-01
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
456-471
ISSN
1530-9576 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1591066389
Cited by
75
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
11.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Performance & Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Policy and Governance
Keywords
participatory budgeting, citizen participation, local government accountability, organizational learning, representativeness, Los Angeles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review