Ecosystem Services of the Terrestrial Isopod Armadillidium Vulgare: Implications for Cellulosic Litter Decomposition and Environmental Cleaning
Open accessAbstract
This study aimed to evaluate the substrate-specific feeding behavior and decomposition efficiency of Armadillidium vulgare on diverse cellulose-based litters, with a focus on its potential role in sustainable organic waste management.Individuals of A. vulgare were collected from agricultural fields and gardens in the Amedi and Zaxo regions of Dohuk Governorate, Iraqi Kurdistan.In a controlled laboratory environment (25°C, 80% relative humidity), isopods were exposed to four types of cellulosic litters: banana peels, maize leaves, wood chips, and stiff paper.Five replicates of eleven individuals each were maintained per litter type for 14 days.Individual consumption measures, such as overall consumption, per capita consumption efficiency, and percentage of overall decomposition, were measured by the use of gravimetric measures.ANOVA was used to arrive at significant differences in substrates by conducting statistical analyses.The level of efficiency in consumption differed greatly among substrates (P < 0.05).Banana peels were the most efficiently consumed with the total of 44.11 g, 0.80 mg/capita efficiency, and the decomposition of 98.02%, it was then by maize leaves (40.69 g, 0.73 mg, 90.42 %), wood chips (37.14 g, 0.67 mg, 82.53 %) and the stiff paper (25.83 g, 0.46mg, 57.4 %).Variations in consumption patterns were influenced by substrate softness, nutrient composition, and structural complexity, rather than cellulose content alone.A. vulgare has distinct feed selectivity, which shows significant prospects as a bio-agent to be employed in decomposing soft and high-nutrient-content organic waste.The given findings emphasize its ecological importance in the nutrient cycles, soil fertility increase, and show the applicability of the species in the implementation of sustainable waste management and composting systems.The future research ought to explore the long-term dynamics of decomposition, the activity of digestive enzymes, and the interaction of the gut microbiome in order to maximize its application in the recycling of organic waste.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
- Authors
- Salman, Z. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Baghdad (IQ)
- Corresponding author
- Salman, Zainab Hamed
- Venue
- Natural and Engineering Sciences
- Publisher
- Natural and Engineering Sciences
- Published
- 2026-01-15
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2458-8989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7162952010
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Natural and Engineering Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Baghdad
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
- Keywords
- Armadillidium vulgare, terrestrial isopods, litter decomposition, organic waste management, banana peel, maize leaves, wood chips, nutrient content, composting, ecosystem services, soil fertility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review