The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ANALISIS PENERAPAN MODEL UTAUT (UNIFIED THEORY OF ACCEPTANCE AND USE OF TECHNOLOGY) TERHADAP PERILAKU PENGGUNA SISTEM INFORMASI (STUDI KASUS: SISTEM INFORMASI AKADEMIK PADA STTNAS YOGYAKARTA)
Open accessAbstract
The appears of the popularity of web technologies and applications have created a vast opportunity for organizations, including institutions of higher education. With the presence of Academic information systems (SiAkad) that is in STTNAS, then do some research to find out the intention of the behavior in the use of Academic information systems using the UTAUT model (Unified Theory Of Acceptance And Use Of Technology). The phenomenon underlying this study is: not yet optimal use of Academic information systems by civitas academic (professors, students and employees) in the process of learning and socializing, so the existence of maximal and haven't yet SiAkad his crisp utilization impact of its use for the entire civitas academic. The study was limited in its scope: the analysis of the influence of Performance Expextancy, Expextancy Effort, Social Influence and Facilitating Condition against the intention SiAkad usage behavior in STTNAS in Yogyakarta. The data in the study on the test with the SEM analysis tool (Structural Equation Modeling). SEM is a tool of statistical analysis that are used to complete the research of multilevel models simultaneously. SEM can be used to solve equations with variables that make up the path. Research results based on the analysis and discussion is a variable PerformanceExpectancy (PE), Social Influence (SI) and Facilitating Condition (FC) effect significantly to Behavioral Intention, while variable Effort Expectancy (EE) provides results that are not significant. Fourth overall Predictor is only able to explain the impact on behavioral intention of 37,6 percent.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The difference in results of previous UTAUT research indicates that the UTAUT model needs to be studied further to ensure it can be applied generally to a system to be evaluated.
“The difference in the results of previous research indicates that the UTAUT model needs to be studied further to ensure that this model can be applied in general to a system to be evaluated.”
From Evaluation of ERP Oracle NetSuite Implementation Using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) Model to Create a Sustainable Business (2023) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Arslan, Muhammad. Riaz, Muhammad Assad, 2010. A Roadmap for Usability and User Experience Measurement during early phases of Web Applications Development Thesis.
- Cooper, Reimann, Cronin, 2007, The Essentials of Interaction Design, Wiley Publishing Inc.
- Foon, YeohSok., Benjamin Chan Yin Fah, 2011, Internet Banking Adoption in Kuala Lumpur: An Application o f UTAUT Model, International Journal of Business and Management. Vol. 6, No. 4. hal. 161-167. · DOI
- Handayani, Rini, 2005, Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Minat Pemanfaatan Sistem Informasi dan Penggunaan Sistem Informasi (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Jakarta). Jurnal Perpustakaan Universitas Mercubuana http://digilib.mercubuana.ac.id), diakses tanggal 8 Agustus 2012. · DOI
- Prasetyo, Hari Basuki., Dian Anubhakti, 2011, Kajian Penerimaan Sistem E-Learning Dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan UTAUT Studi kasus Fakultas Teknologi Informasi Universitas Budi Luhur, Jurnal BIT Vol. 8, No. 2. hal. 45-47.
- Sedana, I Gusti Nyoman., St Wisnu Wijaya, 2009, Penerapan Model UTAUT untuk Memahami Penerimaan Dan Penggunaan Learning Management System Studi Kasus: ExperentialE-Learning Of Sanata Dharma University, Jurnal Sistem Informasi, Vol. 5, No. 2. hal 114-120. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marsintauli, F., & Sari, M. (2023) · E3S Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202342602037 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Handayani, T., & Sudiana, S.
- Venue
- Angkasa: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi
- Published
- 2017-09-13
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165
- ISSN
- 2085-9503 (ISSN-L)
- 2581-1355
- OpenAlex
- W2596987029
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Angkasa Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Decision Support System Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Engineering and Information Technology
- Keywords
- UTAUT, technology acceptance, academic information system, behavioral intention, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, higher education institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review