Cited by 19Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentAgricultural safety and regulationsDye analysis and toxicity

Orotic acid salts as sources of orotic acid and various minerals added for nutritional purposes to food supplements

Open access
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)·2009·EFSA Journal

Abstract

The petitioners have submitted only few data concerning the toxicity of orotic acid and none on the salts. Orotic acid has a low acute toxicity. In repeated doses orotic acid induces fatty livers in the rat, but not in other species tested. No data were submitted on reproductive and \ndevelopmental toxicity and only irrelevant data on genotoxicity. \nSeveral studies have shown that repeated dosing of orotic acid to rats and some other species promotes the formation of tumours initiated by various known carcinogenic substances. The usual concentration to promote tumours has been 1 % in the diet, but also 0.5 and 0.2 % in the diet has been shown to have promoting effect, while 0.1 % in the diet did not have effect within the time span tested (up to 20 weeks). A No Observed Adverse Effect Level for this effect can thus be determined to be 50 mg/kg bw/day, while the Lowest Observed Effect \nLevel is 100 mg/kg bw/day. In a long-term feeding study in rats, 1 % orotic acid in the diet without any initiation, increased the frequency of tumours likely due to a promoting effect of orotic acid on \nspontaneously arising and/or diet induced altered cells. Orotic acid salts as sources of orotic acid and various minerals added for nutritional purposes to food supplements The Panel considers that it is not appropriate to conclude on the safety for a combination \nbetween chromium and a tumour promoter as long as it is not clear whether chromium is genotoxic or not. The Panel concludes that…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1187

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
(EFSA), E. F. S. A.
Corresponding author
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Venue
EFSA Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
1187
ISSN
1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4229626824
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EFSA Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • Phaidra (Universität Wien) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Dye analysis and toxicity
Keywords
orotic acid, dietary supplements, mineral fortification, choline, tumor promotion, carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, acute toxicity, hepatic steatosis, chromium, safety assessment, dietary exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review