Statement on the update of the list of QPS‐recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA. 2: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2015
Open accessAbstract
EFSA is requested to assess the safety of a broad range of biological agents in the context of notifications for market authorisation as sources of food and feed additives, enzymes and plant protection products. The qualified presumption of safety (QPS) assessment was developed to provide a harmonised generic pre-assessment to support safety risk assessments performed by EFSA's scientific Panels. The safety of unambiguously defined biological agents (at the highest taxonomic unit appropriate for the purpose for which an application is intended), and the completeness of the body of knowledge are assessed. Identified safety concerns for a taxonomic unit are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected as ‘qualifications’ in connection with a recommendation for a QPS status. A total of 85 biological agents were notified to EFSA between October 2014 and March 2015. From those, 35 biological agents already had a QPS status and were not further evaluated, and 45 were also not included as they are filamentous fungi or enterococci, biological groups which have been excluded from the QPS activities since 2014. Two notifications referred to two taxonomic units which were evaluated for the QPS status, one of which was recommended for the QPS list: Xanthomonas campestris, only for the production of xanthan gum, while the other, Bacillus circulans, was not due to insufficient body of knowledge on a safe history of use in foods and feeds. Three notifications belonging to the genus Streptomyces were not evaluated for the QPS status, because the genus was recently considered not suitable for the QPS approach.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bifidobacterium is one of the main genera of commensal bacteria present in the human GIT and its presence has been related to health benefits in several studies.
“Bifidobacterium is one of the main genera of commensal bacteria present in the human GIT and its presence has been related to health benefits in several studies (83).”
From Bifidobacteria and Their Health-Promoting Effects (2017) · cites this paper as [83]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 73
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA on the introduction of a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach for assessment of selected microorganisms referred to EFSA. The EFSA Journal 2007, 587, 1-16.
- Li ZX, Bian ZS, Zheng HP, Yue YS, Yao JY, Gong YP, Cai MY and Dong XZ, 1990. 1st isolation of Xanthomonas campestris from the blood of a Chinese woman. Chinese Medical Journal, 103, 435-439.
- Authors
- (BIOHAZ), E. P. O. B. H.
- Corresponding author
- EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ)
- Venue
- EFSA Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4233607443
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 17.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- EFSA Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Keywords
- qualified presumption of safety, biological agents, food additives, feed additives, enzymes, plant protection products, taxonomic units, Xanthomonas campestris, xanthan gum, Bacillus circulans, Streptomyces, filamentous fungi, Enterococcus, safety risk assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review