Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Agricultural safety and regulationsPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesFungal Plant Pathogen Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Pseudozyma flocculosa strain ATTC 64874: Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of Pseudozyma flocculosa strain ATTC 64874

Open access
European Food Safety Authority·2015·EFSA Journal
DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4250
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4250

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 2

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Authority, E. F. S.
Corresponding author
European Food Safety Authority
Venue
EFSA Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-10
Volume
13
Issue
10
Pages
4250
ISSN
1831-4732 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4250
OpenAlex
W4240556422
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
  • cc-by-nd
  • doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1 (tdm)
Locations
EFSA Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
yeast strain, pesticide risk assessment, active ingredients, food safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Pseudozyma flocculosa strain ATTC 64874: Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of Pseudozyma flocculosa strain ATTC 64874. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4250
The paper
Authority, E. F. S. (2015). Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Pseudozyma flocculosa strain ATTC 64874: Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of Pseudozyma flocculosa strain ATTC 64874. EFSA Journal. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4250

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.